Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40298928›Full record

ArticleNutrition reviews2025

Diversity of Plant-Based Food Consumption: A Systematic Scoping Review on Measurement Tools and Associated Health Outcomes.

Alice C Creedon, Vienna Hubbard, Rachel Gibson, Eirini Dimidi

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrition reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Mechanisms of action and biocontrol potential ofFrontiers in fungal biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alice C CreedonDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, King's College London, London, SE1 9NH, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5054-1786
Vienna HubbardDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, King's College London, London, SE1 9NH, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0001-7867-2494
Rachel GibsonDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, King's College London, London, SE1 9NH, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5823-6468
Eirini DimidiDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, King's College London, London, SE1 9NH, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0140-0199

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A scoping review of the literature was conducted to identify studies investigating plant-based food diversity and human health outcomes. Objectives were to (a) explore definition(s) of plant-based foods used, (b) identify assessment tools used to measure plant-based food consumption, (c) characterize the assessment tools and methodology used to measure the diversity of plant-based food consumption, and (d) identify the health outcomes that have been investigated in relation to the diversity of plant-based food consumption, and explore the findings. Consumption of diverse plant-based foods provides a rich source of nutrients and nonnutrient bioactives that are often reported to improve health outcomes. Despite this, there are no standard definitions of plant-based food diversity, there is no consensus on methods of measurement, and there is limited understanding of its associated health benefits. Eligible studies were those investigating the relationship between plant-based food diversity and any health-related or lifestyle outcome, by any study design, in high income countries only. Studies were identified by systematic searches of 2 electronic databases and manual searches of reference lists. No restrictions were applied for language or year of publication. Forty-three studies were eligible for inclusion in this review. The majority of the studies were observational in design (38/43; 88%) and included fruits and vegetables only in their definitions of plant-based food diversity (31/43, 72%). Methods of measurement of both plant-based food intake and diversity varied greatly between studies, with only 3 (7%) articles reporting the use of a dedicated tool for assessment of plant-based food diversity in their population of interest. Health outcomes assessed included dietary intake and behavior, cardiometabolic risk factors, socioeconomic determinants of health, and cancer risk. There is a need for a robust definition and standardized assessment tools for plant-based food diversity. Observational studies have found associations between plant-based food diversity and certain health outcomes that warrant investigation in future randomized controlled trials.

Indexed as

DietDiet, VegetarianPlants, EdibleFruitHumansVegetablesdiet qualitydiversityplant-based dietplant-based foodsvariety

Identifiers

PMID40298928
PMCPMC12422005

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.