Evidence mapPaperPMID 40299240Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2025

Characterizing surveillance-associated anxiety following curative-intent surgery for gastrointestinal cancer: a mixed methods approach.

Natalie M Bath, Rakhsha Khatri, Patrick L Quinn, Joanne Kim, Mary Dillhoff, Aslam Ejaz, John Hays, Anne Noonan, Emily Huang, Alex Kim and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Natalie M BathDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Rakhsha KhatriDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Patrick L QuinnDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Joanne KimDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.
Mary DillhoffDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Aslam EjazDepartment of Surgery, University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System, Chicago, IL, USA.
John HaysDepartment of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Anne NoonanDepartment of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Emily HuangDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Alex KimDepartment of Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Timothy M PawlikDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Jordan M CloydDepartment of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA. jordan.cloyd@osumc.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeImaging is often an essential component of cancer surveillance following curative-intent surgery but can be distressing for some patients. While this phenomenon has been studied among patients undergoing active cancer treatment and screening, the frequency and severity of "scanxiety" among patients undergoing surveillance after curative-intent cancer surgery is poorly understood.

methodsA cross-sectional mixed-methods analysis of patients with a history of resected gastrointestinal (GI) or hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) cancer undergoing routine cancer surveillance was conducted. After their imaging was completed but before meeting with their provider, patients completed the Impact of Events Scale-revised (IES-r) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) anxiety subscale surveys. IES-r and HADS-anxiety scores ≥ 24 (scale 0-88) and ≥ 11 (scale 0-22), respectively, were considered clinically meaningful. Semi-structured interviews were conducted among a convenience sample of patients, which were subsequently transcribed and then coded using an inductive approach.

resultsAmong 101 participants, mean age was 62 ± 13.9 years old and 52% were male. The most common diagnoses were cancers of the pancreas (23.8%), appendix (20.8%), and colon & rectum (20.8%). Mean time since surgery was 30.7 ± 28.0 months. Overall IES-r and HADS scores were 12.1 ± 14.7 and 5.2 ± 4.7, respectively. On multivariable linear regression analysis, a previous mental health diagnosis was associated with increased HADS, total IES, and all IES subscale scores whereas older age was associated with lower HADS and total IES scores (all p < 0.05). African American race, public insurance, and longer distance traveled were associated with increased IES hyperarousal scores. Qualitative analysis highlighted the psychological symptoms associated with surveillance imaging, its impact on daily living, and primary coping strategies.

conclusionsIn this cross-sectional study of patients with resected GI and HPB cancers, symptoms of anxiety and post-traumatic stress around the time of routine cancer surveillance were common but relatively mild. A prior mental health diagnosis and younger age may be risk factors for greater symptomatology. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Future research should work to identify which patients are at highest risk for surveillance-associated anxiety so that patient-centered interventions can be designed and studied in this growing patient population.

Indexed as

Cancer surveillance imagingGastrointestinal cancersMixed-methods analysisScan-associated anxiety

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.