Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40299653›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2025

Artificial Intelligence Advancements in Oncology: A Review of Current Trends and Future Directions.

Ellen N Huhulea, Lillian Huang, Shirley Eng, Bushra Sumawi, Audrey Huang, Esewi Aifuwa, Rahim Hirani, Raj K Tiwari, Mill Etienne

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Spinal morphology-based multimodal AI for predicting pulmonary dysfunction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ellen N HuhuleaSchool of Medicine, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY 10595, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-5999-8245
Lillian HuangSchool of Medicine, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY 10595, USA.
Shirley EngSchool of Medicine, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY 10595, USA.
Bushra SumawiBarshop Institute, The University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA.
Audrey HuangSchool of Medicine, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY 10595, USA.
Esewi AifuwaSchool of Medicine, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY 10595, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-5523-167X
Rahim HiraniSchool of Medicine, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY 10595, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9304-9916
Raj K TiwariSchool of Medicine, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY 10595, USA.
Mill EtienneSchool of Medicine, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY 10595, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8086-3986

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer remains one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide, driving the need for innovative approaches in research and treatment. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a powerful tool in oncology, with the potential to revolutionize cancer diagnosis, treatment, and management. This paper reviews recent advancements in AI applications within cancer research, focusing on early detection through computer-aided diagnosis, personalized treatment strategies, and drug discovery. We survey AI-enhanced diagnostic applications and explore AI techniques such as deep learning, as well as the integration of AI with nanomedicine and immunotherapy for cancer care. Comparative analyses of AI-based models versus traditional diagnostic methods are presented, highlighting AI's superior potential. Additionally, we discuss the importance of integrating social determinants of health to optimize cancer care. Despite these advancements, challenges such as data quality, algorithmic biases, and clinical validation remain, limiting widespread adoption. The review concludes with a discussion of the future directions of AI in oncology, emphasizing its potential to reshape cancer care by enhancing diagnosis, personalizing treatments and targeted therapies, and ultimately improving patient outcomes.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecancerdeep learningmachine learningnanomedicineoncologysocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID40299653
PMCPMC12025054

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.