ArticlePloS one2025
A prospective study of comparing waist circumference and BMI as predictors for the kidney damage progression.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveChronic kidney disease (CKD) is irreversible and linked with various adverse health outcomes and diminished quality of life. Although obesity is recognized as a risk factor for the progression of kidney damage, reliance solely on body mass index (BMI) to measure obesity has been increasingly questioned. The use of other indicators that reflect more on abdominal adiposity like waist circumference (WC) have been proposed. This study aims to determine whether WC can serve as an alternative predictor of kidney damage progression.
methodsThis prospective study enrolled individuals with normal kidney function during their annual health checkups from April 2016 to March 2019. Data on BMI, WC, WC-related devices, health-related lifestyle, and comorbidities were collected at baseline. WC was categorized using various definitions and analyzed for its association with the risk of kidney damage progression, taking into account BMI categories. The participants were monitored until March 2023 to observe kidney damage progression.
resultsOut of the 4,129 participants, WC showed a higher risk of kidney damage progression in males (HR=1.01-1.39, p-value<0.05). These associations were not observed in females. After adjusting for BMI categories, the associations disappeared. Males in the overweight BMI category, defined as a BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2, showed a significantly increased risk of kidney damage progression (HR = 1.69, p-value < 0.0001).
conclusionsThe findings indicate that waist circumference significantly affects the progression of kidney damage in males. However, the study also reaffirms BMI as a dependable predictor of kidney damage. It underscores the importance of maintaining normal ranges for both BMI and waist circumference to reduce the risk of progressing kidney damage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.