ReviewJournal of agricultural and food chemistry2025
Consistency of Phenolic Compounds in Plant Residues Parts: A Review of Primary Sources, Key Compounds, and Extraction Trends.
Review in Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Agri-Food Byproducts to High-Value Bioactive Compounds: A Critical Review Linking Green Recovery and Chemical Profiling to Circular Valorization.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Sustainable Recovery and Biofunctional Characterization of Polyphenol-Rich Extracts from Norway Spruce, Chestnut Wood, and Pomegranate By-Products.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Piceatannol from Passion Fruit Seed Waste: A Circular Bioeconomy-Driven Pathway Toward a Skin-Targeted Bioactive.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Comparative Phytochemical Profiling and Wound Healing Potential ofFood science & nutrition · 2026Article
- Polyphenols in Sugar Beet Leaves: Composition, Variability, and Valorization Opportunities.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Revaluation of Granadilla (International journal of food science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A significant challenge in valorizing food waste is the accurate extraction and identification of metabolites, as the composition of phenolic compounds varies by plant species, part, growth conditions, and processing. This review examined phenolic compounds in plant residue groups (leaves/stalks, peels/husks, pulp/pomace, and seeds) to verify the predominance of specific compounds in the same plant groups, establishing a comprehensive database. This database may be helpful for future studies that seek sources of a given compound or develop solvents to extract phenolic compounds from a specific material. Moreover, the primary plant residues and trends in extracting and analyzing these compounds were reviewed. The predominance of specific compounds within these groups, such as luteolin in plant leaves and stalks, was observed. Most studies focus on extracts with the highest total phenolic content (TPC), limiting insights into how extraction variables affect the target compounds. Chromatographic methods vary according to sample type, column, and conditions, shifting toward reducing acetone/methanol use, shortening the analysis time, and integrating inline UV-vis detection. This perspective highlights plant residue parts rich in specific phenolics, contributing to more targeted, selective, and sustainable extraction methodologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.