Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40300064›Full record

ReviewMolecular pharmaceutics2025

Development of a Physiologically Based Biopharmaceutics Model Report Template: Considerations for Improved Quality in View of Regulatory Submissions.

Sumit Arora, Xavier Pepin, Masoud Jamei, Pradeep Sharma, Tycho Heimbach, Christian Wagner, Philip Bransford, Sivacharan Kollipara, Tausif Ahmed, Martin Hingle and 14 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular pharmaceutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Best Practices in Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Modeling.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Sumit AroraJanssen Pharmaceutica NV, Turnhoutseweg 30, 2340 Beerse, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8860-667X
Xavier PepinSimulations Plus Inc., 42505 10th Street West, Lancaster, California 93534, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2180-5452
Masoud JameiPredictive Technologies, Certara U.K., Level 2-Acero, 1 Concourse Way, Sheffield S1 2BJ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3443-0194
Pradeep SharmaClinical Pharmacology and Quantitative Pharmacology, Clinical Pharmacology and Safety Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge CB4 0WG, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3415-8917
Tycho HeimbachPharmaceutical Sciences and Clinical Supply, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey 07065, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1224-0629
Christian WagnerGlobal Drug Product Development, Global CMC Development, The Healthcare Business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt 64293, Germany.
Philip BransfordData and Computational Sciences, Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc., Boston, Massachusetts 02210, United States.
Sivacharan KolliparaBiopharmaceutics Group, Global Clinical Management, Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd., Integrated Product Development Organization (IPDO), Bachupally, Medchal Malkajgiri District, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 090, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7332-9021
Tausif AhmedBiopharmaceutics Group, Global Clinical Management, Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd., Integrated Product Development Organization (IPDO), Bachupally, Medchal Malkajgiri District, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 090, India.
Martin HingleTechnical Research and Development, Novartis Pharma AG, 4051 Basel, Switzerland.
André DallmannBayer HealthCare SAS, Lille 59000, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1108-5719
Megerle ScherholzPharmaceutical Development, Bristol Myers Squibb, Route 206 and Province Line Road, Princeton, New Jersey 08543, United States.
Stephen D StamatisLilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285-0001, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9919-2011
Mario Cano-VegaDrug Product Technologies, Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, California 91320, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9765-485X
Nena MistryBiopharmaceutics, Drug Product Development, Medicine Development and Supply, R&D, GSK, Ware SG12 0DP, United Kingdom.
Christer TannergrenBiopharmaceutics Science, New Modalities & Parenteral Product Development, Pharmaceutical Technology & Development, Operations, AstraZeneca, Gothenburg 43183, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3897-337X
Luiza BorgesBrazilian Health Regulatory Agency (ANVISA), Division of Therapeutic Equivalence (CETER), SIA Trecho 5 - Guará, Brasília, Federal District 71205-050, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8634-221X
Anders LindahlSwedish Medical Products Agency, Uppsala 752 37, Sweden.
Gregory RulloRegulatory CMC, AstraZeneca, 1 Medimmune Way, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20878, United States.
Claire MackieJanssen Pharmaceutica NV, Turnhoutseweg 30, 2340 Beerse, Belgium.ORCID 0009-0002-2322-1861
Amitava MitraClinical Pharmacology, Kura Oncology Inc., Boston, Massachusetts 02210, United States.
Joseph KushnerPfizer Inc, Groton, Connecticut 06340, United States.
Krutika Meena Harish JainAnalytical Development and Operations, Gilead Sciences, 355 Lakeside Drive, Foster City, California 94404, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6195-4372
James E PolliSchool of Pharmacy, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5274-4314

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pharmaceutical innovators and generic companies use Physiologically Based Biopharmaceutics Models (PBBMs) to guide drug product development and potentially waive clinical pharmacokinetic studies for both pre- and postapproval changes. This modeling approach can assist with biopharmaceutics risk assessment and the establishment of patient centric, clinically relevant drug product specifications. However, the variability of possible model strategies and the existence of gaps in scientific knowledge associated with the lack of standardized regulatory expectations for model parametrization, data requirements for model development, and criteria for fit-for-purpose model validation leads to varied acceptance rates and frequent requests for additional information and deficiencies in PBBM submissions across regulatory agencies. During the 2023 Maryland Center of Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation (M-CERSI) PBBM Best Practices for Drug Product Quality: Regulatory and Industry Perspectives workshop, it was identified that a PBBM report template summarizing model considerations and proposing a structure for presenting question(s) of interest, model context, input data, a modeling plan, and validation would be beneficial for both industry and regulatory agencies. The present work is not a regulatory guideline but rather a summary of current best practices and considerations for PBBM submissions. The associated template can be downloaded directly from the Supporting Information to guide one in the preparation of PBBM reports. The current paper discusses the critical elements of the PBBM report template, which were identified during the industry-regulator scientific collaboration and interactions.

Indexed as

BiopharmaceuticsDrug DevelopmentModels, BiologicalDrug IndustryHumansRisk AssessmentClinically Relevant Dissolution Specifications (CRDS)Context of UseModel-Informed Drug Development (MIDD)Model Risk AssessmentPhysiologically Based Biopharmaceutics Models (PBBMs)Question of InterestRegulatory/Model ImpactReport Template

Identifiers

PMID40300064
PMCPMC12135060

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.