Trial reportClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2025
A Phase II Randomized Study of Paclitaxel Alone or Combined with Pelareorep with or without Avelumab in Metastatic Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: The BRACELET-01/PrE0113 Study.
Trial report in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Talimogene laherparepvec and atezolizumab in HER2-negative breast cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a window-of-opportunity phase II trial (SOLTI-1503 PROMETEO).Nature communications · 2026Trial
- Beyond cold to hot: oncolytic virotherapy as the next cornerstone of immuno-oncology.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- In Vivo Tracking Modalities for Oncolytic Reovirus: Principles, Clinical Applications, and Translational Integration.Molecular imaging and biology · 2026Review
- Review
- Improved oncolytic and immunostimulatory activity of the spontaneousMolecular therapy. Oncology · 2026Article
- Progress in the research and development of oncolytic virus therapies.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Immune Checkpoint Blockade and Emerging Combination Platforms in Breast Cancer: A Narrative Review.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2026Review
- Recombinant Oncolytic Viruses: Hexagonal Warriors in the Field of Solid Tumor Immunotherapy.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
- Oncolytic viruses as anticancer agents: clinical progress and remaining challenges.Lancet (London, England) · 2025Review
- Synergy of oncolytic adenovirus and immune checkpoint inhibitors: transforming cancer immunotherapy paradigms.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePelareorep (Pel) is a type 3 oncolytic reovirus that upregulates PD-L1 expression. We determined the objective response rate (ORR) with paclitaxel (Pac), Pac + Pel, or Pac + Pel + avelumab (Ave). PATIENTS AND
methodsPatients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer who had progressed on at least one line of endocrine therapy with a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor and had not received chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer were eligible. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to Pac, Pac/Pel, or Pac/Pel/Ave after a three-patient run-in confirmed safety of the triplet regimen. Response was assessed every 8 weeks until week 16 and then every 12 weeks using RECIST v1.1. The primary endpoint was 16-week ORR. Statistical comparison across arms was not planned.
resultsForty-eight patients were enrolled, with 45 randomized. The 16-week ORR was 20%, 31%, and 14% in the Pac, Pac/Pel, and Pac/Pel/Ave arms, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 6.4, 12.1, and 5.8 months in the Pac, Pac/Pel, and Pac/Pel/Ave arms, respectively. There were more adverse events, particularly infusion reactions, in the combination arms than the Pac arm. Expansion of peripheral T-cell clones was observed by cycle 4 in Pac/Pel but not the Pac or Pac/Pel/Ave arms.
conclusionsThe addition of Pel to Pac was associated with increased toxicity, expanded peripheral T-cell clones, and numerically increased the ORR and progression-free survival compared with Pac; Pac/Pel/Ave further increased toxicity and blunted T-cell responses without obvious increase in efficacy. Investigation of the Pac/Pel combination warrants consideration with careful attention to acute toxicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.