ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2025
Survival Tree Analysis of Interactions Among Factors Associated With Colorectal Cancer Risk in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Interaction Patterns Among Risk Factors for Liver Cancer in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in Primary Care: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Integrative analysis of serum lipids and chronic gastritis: causal insights from mendelian randomization and experimental models.Lipids in health and disease · 2025Article
- Deep Learning and Image Generator Health Tabular Data (IGHT) for Predicting Overall Survival in Patients With Colorectal Cancer: Retrospective Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- The metabolism-immune axis in colorectal cancer: remodeling the tumor microenvironment through metabolite signaling.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) and diabetes share many common lifestyle risk factors, such as obesity. However, it remains largely unknown how different factors interact to influence the risk of CRC development among patients with diabetes. Objective: This study aimed to identify the interaction patterns among factors associated with the risk of CRC incidence among patients with diabetes. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study conducted using electronic health records from Hong Kong. Patients who were diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and received care in general outpatient clinics between 2010 and 2019 without cancer history were included and followed up until December 2019. A conditional inference survival tree was applied to examine the interaction patterns among factors associated with the risk of CRC. Results: A total of 386,325 patients were included. During a median follow-up of 6.2 years (IQR 3.3-8.0), 4199 patients developed CRC. Patients were first partitioned into 4 age groups by increased levels of CRC risk (≤54 vs 55 to 61 vs 62 to 73 vs >73 years). Among patients aged more than 54 years, male sex was the dominant risk factor for CRC within each age stratum and the associations lessened with age. Abdominal obesity (waist-to-hip ratio >0.95) and longer duration of diabetes (median 12, IQR 7-18 vs median 4, IQR 1-11 years) were identified as key risk factor for CRC among men aged between 62 and 73 years and women aged more than 73 years, respectively. Conclusions: This study suggests the interaction patterns among age, sex, waist-to-hip ratio, and duration of diabetes on the risk of CRC incidence among patients with diabetes. Findings of the study may help identify target groups for public health intervention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.