Evidence mapPaperPMID 40300321Full record

ArticlePoultry science2025

Chickens perceive humans as social buffers and may follow human-given cues: A pilot study.

Vitor Hugo Bessa Ferreira, Elise Calesse, Lucille Dumontier, Fabien Cornilleau, Julie Lemarchand, Auriane Foreau, Maxime Quentin, Léa Lansade, Céline Tallet, Xavier Boivin and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Vitor Hugo Bessa FerreiraINRAE, CNRS, Université de Tours, Centre Val de Loire UMR Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements, 37380, Nouzilly, France. Electronic address: vitor.ferreira@inrae.fr.
Elise CalesseINRAE, CNRS, Université de Tours, Centre Val de Loire UMR Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements, 37380, Nouzilly, France.
Lucille DumontierINRAE, CNRS, Université de Tours, Centre Val de Loire UMR Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements, 37380, Nouzilly, France.
Fabien CornilleauINRAE, CNRS, Université de Tours, Centre Val de Loire UMR Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements, 37380, Nouzilly, France.
Julie LemarchandINRAE, CNRS, Université de Tours, Centre Val de Loire UMR Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements, 37380, Nouzilly, France.
Auriane ForeauITAVI, 37380, Nouzilly, France.
Maxime QuentinITAVI, 37380, Nouzilly, France.
Léa LansadeINRAE, CNRS, Université de Tours, Centre Val de Loire UMR Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements, 37380, Nouzilly, France.
Céline TalletPEGASE, INRAE, Institut Agro, 35590, Saint-Gilles, France.
Xavier BoivinUniversité Clermont-Auvergne, INRAE, VetAgro Sup, UMR Herbivores, F-63122, Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France.
Ludovic CalandreauINRAE, CNRS, Université de Tours, Centre Val de Loire UMR Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements, 37380, Nouzilly, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Positive perception of humans, extensively documented in domestic mammals, remains comparatively underexplored in domestic birds like chickens, with existing studies largely focusing on fear reduction. This research evaluated whether chickens perceive humans positively, accounting for interaction types and breed differences. Two breeds (Lohmann LSL Classic, Brown Classic) experienced physical contact (PC), visual-only contact (VC), or minimal human contact (MC) over 13 days (Days 35-51; PC and VC: 1-2 min/day). Birds were assessed using three behavioral tests. During the separation-reunion test (Days 52-53), individuals underwent two 3-min separations (experimenter absent) and reunions (experimenter present) in an open-field setting. Subsequently, the experimenter attempted up to six standardized capture attempts to catch the birds (the capture test). Lastly, the local enhancement test (Days 120-137) assessed birds' ability to use human presence/gestures to locate food. In the separation-reunion test, PC birds exhibited calmer/positive behaviors, such as reduced vigilance and increased foraging, in the presence of the experimenter compared to being alone. Conversely, MC birds displayed fewer calm behaviors and greater withdrawal when the experimenter was present. Brown birds showed more calm behaviors, reduced movement, and spent more time near the experimenter than white birds. The capture test supported these results, with PC and brown birds being easier to capture. In the local enhancement test, two PC individuals and the brown PC group as a whole successfully used human-given cues to locate food rewards. These results indicate that, as observed in other species, chickens-especially those with positive human experiences-can associate humans with rewarding outcomes. Positive interactions may also lead chickens to perceive humans as social buffers-that is, as factors that help mitigate stress in challenging situations. Although fundamental, this study highlights the potential of breed-sensitive approaches to improve poultry welfare and opens the discussion on adapting human-animal interactions to breed-specific characteristics. These insights can inform welfare-enhancing practices and provide practical tools for on-farm management that benefit both animals and farmers.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalChickensHuman-Animal InteractionAnimal HusbandryAnimalsCuesFemaleHumansMalePilot ProjectsCognitive abilitiesGeneticsHuman-animal relationshipPulletSocial buffering

Identifiers

PMID40300321
PMCPMC12434278

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.