Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40300815›Full record

ArticleAnnals of family medicine2025

Feasibility and Acceptability of Implementing a Digital Cognitive Assessment for Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias in Primary Care.

Nicole R Fowler, Dustin B Hammers, Anthony J Perkins, Diana Summanwar, Anna Higbie, Kristen Swartzell, Jared R Brosch, Deanna R Willis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of family medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nicole R FowlerDepartment of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana fowlern@iu.edu.
Dustin B HammersDepartment of Neurology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Anthony J PerkinsDepartment of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Diana SummanwarDepartment of Family Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Anna HigbieIndiana University Center for Aging Research, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Kristen SwartzellSchool of Nursing, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.
Jared R BroschDepartment of Neurology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Deanna R WillisDepartment of Family Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe assessed the feasibility and acceptability of implementing a digital cognitive assessment (DCA) for Alzheimer disease and related dementias (ADRD) screening into primary care. We also assessed the prevalence of positive screens and measured diagnostic and care outcomes after a positive DCA result.

methodsWe conducted a single-arm pragmatic clinical demonstration project in 7 diverse primary care clinics to test implementation of the Linus Health Core Cognitive Evaluation and Digital Clock and Recall DCAs (Linus Health, Inc). Eligible patients were aged ≥65 years. Patients were ineligible if unable to see or hear, not English or Spanish speaking, or if they had a DCA in the past 12 months with an unimpaired or impaired result.

resultsThere were 16,708 eligible encounters during the 12-month study period (June 2022-May 2023). A total of 1,808 DCAs (10.8%) were completed by 1,722 unique patients; 3,727 (22.3%) declined, and at 9,232 encounters (55.3%) the physicians declined to have the patient complete the DCA or the encounter was deemed out of scope. Among those who completed DCAs, results for 762 (44.3%) were categorized as unimpaired, 628 (36.5%) borderline, 236 (13.7%) impaired, and 96 (5.6%) inconclusive. Among the 236 patients who were categorized as impaired, 2.1% received a new diagnosis of ADRD, and 5.1% received a new diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment within 90 days after the DCA.

conclusionsOne-half of all patients scored impaired or borderline for cognitive impairment. Digital cognitive assessments can be implemented in primary care, have utility for early detection, and could represent the first step in identification of patients who could benefit from ADRD disease-modifying therapeutics, care management, or other interventions to improve patient and family caregiver outcomes.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionDementiaMass ScreeningPatient Acceptance of Health CareAgedAged, 80 and overFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMental Status and Dementia TestsNeuropsychological TestsPrimary Health CareAlzheimer diseasedementiadigital cognitive assessmentprimary carescreening

Identifiers

PMID40300815
PMCPMC12120163

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.