ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2025
Differential Impact of Retinal Lesions on Visual Responses of LGN X and Y Cells.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Damage to retinal cells from disease or injury causes vision loss and remodeling of downstream visual information processing circuits. As retinal cell replacement therapies and prosthetics become increasingly viable, we must understand the postretinal consequences of retinal cell loss to optimally recover visual perception. Here, we asked whether loss of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) differentially impacts postsynaptic neurons in the visual thalamus-the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN)-of ferrets, highly visual carnivores. We hypothesized that RGC loss might impact X more than Y LGN neurons, as there is less divergence in X retinogeniculate connections. We induced excitotoxic lesions of RGCs in a single eye and recorded neurophysiological responses of both contra- and ipsilesional LGN neurons to a variety of visual stimuli. We observed loss of responses among many LGN neurons, presumably with receptive fields within the scotoma. We also observed contralesional LGN neurons with receptive fields within or at the border of the scotoma that responded consistently to drifting sinusoidal gratings and spatiotemporally dynamic stimuli, enabling their classification as X or Y cells. Contralesional Y cell responses remained intact while contralesional X cells demonstrated higher firing rates, altered tuning to stimulus contrast and temporal frequency, and reduced spike timing precision. Consistent with neurophysiological results, alpha RGCs appeared relatively spared compared with beta RGCs. Together, our findings show that retinal cell loss differentially impacts downstream neuronal circuits, suggesting that supplemental vision recovery therapies may need to target visual circuits specialized for acuity vision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.