Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40301737›Full record

SynthesisBMC gastroenterology2025

Efficacy and safety of Mirikizumab for ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Mohamed A Abu Elainein, Sama S ElSherefy, Norhan M Yousef, Sama M ElKady, Nada G Hamam, Abdullrahman Elgarawany, Darin W Aswa, Ahmed Nour Eldin Hassan, Salma Allam

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mohamed A Abu ElaineinFaculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-1891-4765
Sama S ElSherefyFaculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-5338-2578
Norhan M YousefFaculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-8967-7191
Sama M ElKadyFaculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-0204-6461
Nada G HamamFaculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-0212-2982
Abdullrahman ElgarawanyFaculty of Medicine, Galala University, Galala City, Suez, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-0717-9225
Darin W AswaFaculty of Medicine, Galala University, Galala City, Suez, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-1124-8084
Ahmed Nour Eldin HassanDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Galala University, Suez, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2939-6064
Salma AllamFaculty of Medicine, Galala University, Galala City, Suez, Egypt. Salma.allam@gu.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-2749-8982

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a widespread incurable chronic inflammation of the colon mucosa. Currently, oral small-molecule medications targeting Janus kinase or sphingosine-1-phosphate and monoclonal antibodies to TNF-α,α4β7 integrins and Ustekinumab are the lines of treatment for UC. Up to 50% of patients either do not react to initial treatment or lose response over time, emphasizing the need for innovative treatment. Mirikizumab, a humanized IgG4-variant monoclonal antibody, binds to subunit p19 of interleukin-23. This systematic review aims to evaluate Mirikizumab compared to placebo in treating moderate-to-severe active UC. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Study design (PICOS) model for inclusion and exclusion criteria, we systematically reviewed the literature. Our inclusion criteria encompassed randomized controlled trials assessing Mirikizumab efficacy in treating UC across demographics. We employed the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB1) to investigate bias within included studies across its seven domains. The statistical analysis was conducted using Review Manager Version 5 software. Four studies were included, comparing patients treated with mirikizumab to placebo groups. All doses of mirikizumab administered intravenously demonstrated clinical remission, specifically, the 200 mg and 300 mg doses showed significant efficacy, with risk ratios of 4.74 (95% CI [1.43, 15.69]) and 1.82 (95% CI [1.33, 2.50]), respectively. During the maintenance phase of extension trials, symptoms subsided with a subcutaneous 200 mg dose (RR = 1.46, 95% CI [0.47, 4.51], P = 0.51). To conclude, mirikizumab demonstrates significant efficacy in treating UC, substaintially improving clinical, endoscopic, and histological outcomes.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedColitis, UlcerativeGastrointestinal AgentsHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedGastrointestinal AgentsIL-23 inhibitorMeta-analysisMirikizumabUlcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID40301737
PMCPMC12039255

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.