Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40302157›Full record

Trial reportHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2025

Perceptions and Experiences of a Multimodal Rehabilitation Program for People With Post-Acute COVID-19: A Qualitative Study.

Beatriz Carpallo-Porcar, Sandra Calvo, Sara Pérez-Palomares, Laura Blázquez-Pérez, Natalia Brandín-de la Cruz, Carolina Jiménez-Sánchez

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04794036 (Efficacy of an Asynchronous Telerehabilitation Programme in Post-COVID-19 Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04794036 nacompletednot on this map

Efficacy of an Asynchronous Telerehabilitation Programme in Post-COVID-19 Patients: a Feasibility Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad San JorgeRan2021 to 2022Enrolled50ConditionsCoronavirus, Fatigue, Musculoskeletal ComplicationArmsAsynchronous telerehabilitation programme, Rehabilitation programme
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Long COVID Optimal Health Programme to Enhance Mental and Physical Health: A Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Beatriz Carpallo-PorcarDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad San Jorge, Zaragoza, Spain.
Sandra CalvoIIS Aragon, Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1674-7788
Sara Pérez-PalomaresIIS Aragon, Zaragoza, Spain.
Laura Blázquez-PérezDepartment of Physiatry and Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Natalia Brandín-de la CruzDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad San Jorge, Zaragoza, Spain.
Carolina Jiménez-SánchezDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad San Jorge, Zaragoza, Spain.

Funding

This study has been supported by a research funding from Universidad San Jorge (ID 2122036). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHome‑based rehabilitation has emerged as a practical solution for post‑acute phase COVID‑19 recovery, but patient perspectives on the different modalities remain underexplored.

objectiveTo explore participants' perceptions and experiences after a 12‑week multimodal rehabilitation program delivered via asynchronous telerehabilitation versus a booklet after discharge and to identify the preferred format.

methodsQualitative descriptive study with two face‑to-face focus groups of post-discharge COVID-19 patients (n = 12; age range 41-75 years; 50% female; with fatigue > 4 on the Fatigue Severity Scale) that included participants from each intervention arm of a randomised pilot study. Semi‑structured interviews to determine patients' perceptions and experiences were recorded, transcribed verbatim and coded independently by two researchers using inductive thematic analysis.

resultsThree overarching themes emerged from the analysis: (1) Facilitators for engagement and adherence: Innovative digital tools and personalised guidance foster active participation by providing flexible access and systematic progress monitoring; (2) Barriers to sustained participation: Technological issues, physical limitations and fluctuating motivation serve as critical impediments, underscoring the potential benefits of hybrid intervention models; and (3) Therapeutic alliance as support: A robust, individualised therapeutic relationship enhances patient confidence and self-management, ultimately contributing to sustained empowerment and recovery.

conclusionsA multimodal home-based rehabilitation program with monitoring and personalisation by the physiotherapist is rated positively by post-acute COVID-19 patients, with asynchronous telerehabilitation emerging as the preferred method. Future research should investigate long‑term adherence, clinical efficacy and scalability. CLINICAL

trial registrationClinialtrials.gov #NCT04794036. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Post-acute COVID-19 patients contributed to the study by actively participating in its development, specifically through describing their experiences as part of a multimodal rehabilitation program. There was no additional participation or contribution from the public to the research.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdultAgedFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsPost-Acute COVID-19 SyndromeQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2TelerehabilitationCOVID‐19multimodal programphysiotherapyqualitative researchtelerehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID40302157
PMCPMC12040759

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.