ArticleAnimal bioscience2025
Meta-analysis of muscle transcriptome data identifies key genes influencing intramuscular fat content in pigs.
Article in Animal bioscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of Candidate miRNAs Associated with Shear Force and Intramuscular Fat in Pig Breeds.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Integrated ATAC-Seq and RNA-Seq Reveal Candidate Regulatory Genes and Chromatin Accessibility Associated with Intramuscular Fat Deposition: An Animal Trial in Hezuo Pigs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Novel Insights into G0S2 as a Central Regulator of Lipid Metabolism and Its Implications for Meat Quality.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe content of intramuscular fat (IMF) is closely linked to meat quality, and the mechanism of IMF deposition is complex. Despite numerous transcriptomic studies on IMF, variations in sample sizes and data analysis methods have produced inconsistent gene expression patterns and results. To identify the pivotal genes influencing pig IMF content, we performed a meta-analysis on 10 pig muscle transcriptome datasets with a total of eighty samples, forty with high and forty with low IMF samples.
methodsDESeq2 has been used to analyze the high and low IMF groups for 10 datasets each, resulting in the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) for each dataset. To identify key genes affecting IMF content, we performed a meta-analysis of the differential expression results from the 10 datasets using MetaVolcanoR. Subsequently, we conducted protein-protein interaction network analysis, Gene Ontology and Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes functional enrichment analysis, and quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis on the DEGs.
resultsThe meta-analysis identified 129 DEGs, comprising 71 upregulated and 58 downregulated DEGs in the high IMF group. The DEGs exhibited enrichment in processes associated with adipocyte differentiation and fat anabolism. QTL analysis demonstrated that five DEGs, including FASN and SCD, corresponded to six QTLs associated with IMF.
conclusionThe findings suggest that meta-analysis effectively integrates data from multiple datasets, resulting in more reliable outcomes. This approach enabled the identification of the core gene cluster comprising FASN, SCD, and PLIN1, LEP, and G0S2, which influence IMF content in pigs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.