Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40302845›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology2025

Managing the acute cardiac functional crisis: a comprehensive review of cardiogenic shock management strategies.

Ahmad Mahajna, Gil Bolotin, Roberto Lorusso

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ahmad MahajnaDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Rambam Medical Center, Ombudsman Rambam Health Care Campus, PO Box 9602, Haifa 3109601, Israel.
Gil BolotinDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Rambam Medical Center, Ombudsman Rambam Health Care Campus, PO Box 9602, Haifa 3109601, Israel.
Roberto LorussoCardio-Thoracic Surgery Department, Maastricht University Medical Centre, 6620 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1777-2045

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a life-threatening condition defined by the heart's inability to adequately pump blood to meet metabolic demands, leading to systemic hypoperfusion and insufficient tissue oxygenation. Despite treatment advancements, CS continues to carry high morbidity and mortality rates, especially when it follows acute myocardial infarction. Various expert groups and scientific societies have proposed recommendations and management pathways, each contributing unique insights yet sometimes overlooking important clinical considerations. This mini-review provides an updated, integrated overview of distinct CS scenarios, including ischaemic, non-ischaemic, and post-cardiotomy categories, and their respective treatment strategies. Additionally, this review explores management approaches that underscore the importance of early detection of inflammatory markers in non-ischaemic CS and targeted therapeutic interventions for each CS subtype. Specifically, the role of pharmacological treatments is examined alongside the relevance and timing of mechanical circulatory support devices. A deeper understanding of the pathophysiology and tailored management pathways for each CS type may enable clinicians to improve interventions and enhance survival and recovery in patients with CS.

Indexed as

Acute myocardial infarctionCardiogenic shockDiagnostic and management strategiesMechanical circulatory support devicesMultidisciplinary care teams

Identifiers

PMID40302845
PMCPMC12036514

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.