Evidence mapPaperPMID 40303243Full record

Trial reportPediatric diabetes2023

Adolescent- and Young Adult-Reported Outcomes and Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Features: A Report from the CITY Trial.

Laurel H Messer, Colleen Bauza, Kellee M Miller, Mark A Clements, Daniel J DeSalvo, Jennifer Sherr, Ruth S Weinstock, Korey Hood, Lori M Laffel

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pediatric diabetes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Laurel H MesserBarbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (now with Tandem Diabetes Care), Aurora, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7493-0989
Colleen BauzaJaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7569-2051
Kellee M MillerT1D Exchange, St. Petersburg, FL, USA.
Mark A ClementsChildren's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Daniel J DeSalvoBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Jennifer SherrYale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Ruth S WeinstockSUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
Korey HoodStanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Lori M LaffelJoslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate patterns of continuous glucose monitor (CGM) use and perceptions of quality of life in adolescents/young adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) after using CGM for up to 52 weeks in the CGM Intervention in Teens and Young (CITY) Adults randomized clinical trial (RCT). Results: In both cohorts, >70% of participants were wearing CGM > 5 days/week at 52 weeks; 5% discontinued CGM. The majority used the mobile app to receive glucose data. Adolescents (14 to <19 years) were more likely to use SHARE features than young adults (80% versus 41%). CGM-CGM participants had significantly higher scores on GMSS, DTA, and HCS at 52 weeks compared with baseline, and reported higher benefit and lower burden perceptions than at baseline. Similar results were observed for the BGM-CGM cohort. Conclusions: Improvements in self-reported measures were observed in adolescents and young adults using CGM. As CGM use is also associated with better glycemic control, utilizing CGM may contribute to improving both medical outcomes and emotional health.

Indexed as

Blood Glucose Self-MonitoringDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1AdolescentBlood GlucoseContinuous Glucose MonitoringFemaleHumansMalePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPatient SatisfactionQuality of LifeYoung AdultBlood Glucose

Identifiers

PMID40303243
PMCPMC12016964

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.