ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025
The association of non-exercise estimated cardiorespiratory fitness with hypertension and all-cause mortality in American and Chinese populations: evidence from NHANES and CHARLS.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Divergent associations of estimated cardiorespiratory fitness with cognitive trajectories in Chinese and U.S. middle-aged and older adults: A descriptive cross-national comparison from CHARLS and HRS.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Non-Exercise Estimated Cardiorespiratory Fitness (NEE-CRF) method has gained attention in recent years due to its simplicity and effectiveness. Hypertension and all-cause mortality are significant public health issues worldwide, highlighting the importance of exploring the association between NEE-CRF and these two conditions. Methods: The data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) and the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) were utilized to validate the association between NEE-CRF and hypertension as well as all-cause mortality. NEE-CRF was calculated using a sex-specific longitudinal non-exercise equation. To investigate the relationship between hypertension and all-cause mortality, multivariable regression analysis, generalized additive models, smooth curve fittings, and threshold effect analysis were employed. Logistic regression was used for hypertension analysis, while Cox proportional hazards regression was applied for all-cause mortality. Additionally, we conducted stratified analyses and interaction tests among different groups. Results: In the NHANES, after fully adjusting for covariates, each unit increase in NEE-CRF was associated with a 24% reduction in the risk of hypertension (OR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.74-0.78) and a 12% reduction in the risk of all-cause mortality (HR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.79-0.86). Subgroup analyses showed that the relationship between NEE-CRF and both hypertension and all-cause mortality remained negatively correlated across different subgroups. The negative association was also validated in the CHARLS. Conclusions: Higher NEE-CRF levels may reduce the risk of developing hypertension and all-cause mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.