ArticleEnvironmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.)2025
Investigation of potential collider bias in estimating the association between long-term exposure to air pollution and COVID-19 mortality.
Article in Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Did Environmental and Climatic Factors Influence the Outcome of the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Republic of Serbia?Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patient-based cohorts were frequently used to investigate air pollution-related coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) evidence, which can be subject to collider bias. However, this bias has not been explored. We aimed to quantify and adjust the collider bias by limiting study population to patients with COVID-19 when estimating the association between long-term exposure to air pollution (LTAP) and COVID-19 mortality. Methods: In a register-based cohort study including 3,721,813 residents aged 30 or older in Denmark, we followed them from 1 March 2020 to 26 April 2021. We estimated the hazard ratios of COVID-19 mortality associated with LTAP. We calculated the relative hazard ratios (RHR) by comparing the hazard ratios of COVID-19 mortality among the general population and patients (infected or hospitalized) to quantify the impact of collider bias, and further applied inverse probability weighting (IPW) to adjust the potential collider bias. Result: We detected 138,742 positive for SARS-CoV-2, 11,270 COVID-19 hospitalizations, and 2557 deaths from COVID-19 during the study period. Although the demographic and socioeconomic characteristics differed among the three populations (general population, infected individuals, and hospitalized patients), infected and hospitalized patients experienced higher air pollution exposure compared with the general population. We observed greater associations of exposure to air pollution with COVID-19 mortality in the general population compared with the COVID-19 infected and hospitalized patients, with RHR of 0.88 (0.82, 0.95) and 0.85 (0.74, 0.97) per 0.55 µg/m Conclusion: Our findings suggest that associations between LTAP and COVID-19 mortality are likely underestimated in patient-based cohorts due to potential collider bias, while IPW could be a useful tool to adjust such bias.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.