ArticleMolecular oral microbiology2025
Shining Light on Oral Biofilm Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH): Probing the Accuracy of In Situ Biogeography Studies.
Article in Molecular oral microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cross hybridization Inference for Phylogenetic Resolution (CIPHR)-FISH enables microbiome imaging with strain level taxonomic resolution.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The oral biofilm has been instrumental in advancing microbial research and enhancing our understanding of oral health and disease. Recent developments in next-generation sequencing have provided detailed insights into the microbial composition of the oral microbiome, enabling species-level analyses of biofilm interactions. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has been especially valuable for studying the spatial organization of these microbes, revealing intricate arrangements such as "corncob" structures that highlight close bacterial interactions. As more genetic sequence data become available, the specificity and accuracy of existing FISH probes used in biogeographical studies require reevaluation. This study examines the performance of commonly used species-specific FISH probes, designed to differentiate oral microbes within in situ oral biofilms, when applied in vitro to an expanded set of bacterial strains. Our findings reveal that the specificity of several FISH probes is compromised, with cross-species hybridization being more common than previously assumed. Notably, we demonstrate that biogeographical associations within in situ oral biofilms, particularly involving Streptococcus and Corynebacterium, may need to be reassessed to align with the latest metagenomic data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.