SynthesisNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2025
Efficacy and safety of imeglimin, a novel oral agent in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Imeglimin-Associated Temporal Changes in γ-Glutamyl Transferase and Total Cholesterol: A Post Hoc Exploratory Analysis of the INFINITY Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- Potential of Triazines as Antidiabetic Agents-A Review of Structures and Pharmacological Activity.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Smartphone-Based Colorimetric Determination of Imeglimin Hydrochloride Using Eosin Y: A Simple and Eco-Friendly Analytical Approach.Analytical science advances · 2025Article
- Imeglimin as an effective therapeutic approach in management of type 2 diabetes mellitus: an umbrella review and systematic review, meta-regression and meta-analysis.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of Imeglimin in managing type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central was conducted up to March 26, 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in T2DM subjects with at least two treatment arms were included in the qualitative analysis. Imeglimin, as monotherapy or in combination with other anti-diabetic agents, was compared to placebo or other treatments. Data were independently extracted by three authors, with discrepancies resolved by two other authors. Outcomes were pooled using random-effects or fixed-effects models based on heterogeneity. Thirteen RCTs and nine observational studies were included in the quantitative and qualitative analyses, respectively. Imeglimin significantly reduced glycated haemoglobin/haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG), with greater efficacy at higher doses and in combination therapy. It improved β-cell function (HOMA-β) without significant effects on insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). No major adverse events were reported. However, the studies were limited to Japanese (Asian) and Caucasian populations, affecting generalizability. Significant heterogeneity amongst studies for some outcomes further indicates the need for comprehensive clinical trials with greater sample sizes and uniform dose ranges and follow-up periods. Imeglimin is an effective and safe option for T2DM, particularly for improving glycemic control and β-cell function. Further studies in diverse populations are needed to confirm these findings. Trial Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42024564036).
Indexed as
Identifiers
40304745What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.