ArticleAnimal cognition2025
Combinatorics and complexity of chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) facial signals.
Article in Animal cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There have been shifts toward more systematic and standardized methods for studying non-human primate facial signals, thanks to advancements like animalFACS. Additionally, there have been calls to better integrate the study of both facial and gestural communication in terms of theory and methodology. However, few studies have taken this important integrative step. By doing so, researchers could gain greater insight into how the physical flexibility of facial signals affects social flexibility. Our study combines both approaches to examine the relationship between the flexibility of physical form and the social function of chimpanzee facial "gestures". We used chimpFACS along with established gestural ethograms that provide insights into four key gesture properties and their associated variables documented in chimpanzee gestures. We specifically investigated how the combinatorics (i.e., the different combinations of facial muscle movements) and complexity (measured by the number of discrete facial muscle movements) of chimpanzee facial signals varied based on: (1) how many gesture variables they exhibit; (2) the presence of a specific goal; and (3) the context in which they were produced. Our findings indicate that facial signals produced with vocalizations exhibit fewer gesture variables, rarely align with specific goals, and exhibit reduced contextual flexibility. Furthermore, facial signals that include additional visual movements (such as those of the head) and other visual signals (like manual gestures) exhibit more gestural variables, are frequently aligned with specific goals, and exhibit greater contextual flexibility. Finally, we discovered that facial signals become more morphologically complex when they exhibit a greater number of gesture variables. Our findings indicate that facial "gesturing" significantly enhanced the facial signaling repertoire of chimpanzees, offering insights into the evolution of complex communication systems like human language.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.