Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40305104›Full record

Trial reportJournal of medical Internet research2025

Potential Harms of Feedback After Web-Based Depression Screening: Secondary Analysis of Negative Effects in the Randomized Controlled DISCOVER Trial.

Franziska Sikorski, Bernd Löwe, Anne Daubmann, Sebastian Kohlmann

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04633096 (The Efficacy of Automated Feedback After Internet-based Depression Screening), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04633096 nacompletednot on this map

The Efficacy of Automated Feedback After Internet-based Depression Screening: the German, Three-armed, Randomised Controlled Trial DISCOVER

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfRan2021 to 2022Enrolled1,178ConditionsDepression, Major Depressive DisorderArmstailored feedback of depression screening results, standardized feedback of depression screening results
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Franziska SikorskiDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1191-5073
Bernd LöweDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4220-3378
Anne DaubmannDepartment of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0156-0926
Sebastian KohlmannDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1307-4618

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWeb-based depression screening followed by automated feedback of results is frequently used and promoted by mental health care providers. However, criticism points to potential associated harms. Systematic empirical evidence on postulated negative effects is missing.

objectiveWe aimed to examine whether automated feedback after web-based depression screening is associated with misdiagnosis, mistreatment, deterioration in depression severity, deterioration in emotional response to symptoms, and deterioration in suicidal ideation at 1 and 6 months after screening.

methodsThis is a secondary analysis of the German-wide, web-based, randomized controlled DISCOVER trial. Affected but undiagnosed individuals screening positive for depression (9-item Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9] ≥10 points) were randomized 1:1:1 to receive nontailored feedback, tailored feedback, or no feedback on their screening result. Misdiagnosis and mistreatment were operationalized as having received a depression diagnosis by a health professional and as having started guideline-based depression treatment since screening (self-report), respectively, while not having met the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fifth Edition) (DSM-V) criteria of a major depressive disorder at baseline (Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-V Disorders). Deterioration in depression severity was defined as a pre-post change of ≥4.4 points in the PHQ-9, deterioration in emotional response to symptoms as a pre-post change of ≥3.1 points in a composite scale of the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire, and deterioration in suicidal ideation as a pre-post change of ≥1 point in the PHQ-9 suicide item. Outcome rates were compared between each feedback arm and the no feedback arm in terms of relative risks (RRs).

resultsIn the per protocol sample of 948 participants (n=685, 72% female; mean age of 37.3, SD 14.1 years), there was no difference in rates of misdiagnosis (ranging from 3.5% to 4.9% across all study arms), mistreatment (7.2%-8.3%), deterioration in depression severity (2%-6.8%), deterioration in emotional response (0.7%-2.9%), and deterioration in suicidal ideation at 6 months (6.8%-13.1%) between the feedback arms and the no feedback arm (RRs ranging from 0.46 to 1.96; P values ≥.13). The rate for deterioration in suicidal ideation at 1 month was increased in the nontailored feedback arm (RR 1.92; P=.01) but not in the tailored feedback arm (RR 1.26; P=.43), with rates of 12.3%, 8.1%, and 6.4% in the nontailored, tailored, and no feedback arms, respectively. All but 1 sensitivity analyses as well as subgroup analyses for false-positive screens supported the findings.

conclusionsThe results indicate that feedback after web-based depression screening is not associated with negative effects such as misdiagnosis, mistreatment, and deterioration in depression severity or in emotional response to symptoms. However, it cannot be ruled out that nontailored feedback may increase the risk of deterioration in suicidal ideation. Robust prospective research on negative effects and particularly suicidal ideation is needed and should inform current practice.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04633096; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04633096; Open Science Framework 10.17605/OSF.IO/TZYRD; https://osf.io/tzyrd.

Indexed as

DepressionFeedbackInternetMass ScreeningAdultDiagnostic ErrorsFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedSecondary Data AnalysisSuicidal IdeationSurveys and Questionnairesdepressive disorderharmsmental healthmisdiagnosisnegative effectsoverdiagnosisrandomized controlled trialscreeningweb-based

Identifiers

PMID40305104
PMCPMC12079080

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.