Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40305162›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2025

A guide to utilizing implementation science for genetic counseling.

Alanna Kulchak Rahm, Deborah Cragun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alanna Kulchak RahmNational Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2513-9298
Deborah CragunUniversity of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Implementation Science (IS) is a growing field that provides tools to understand and facilitate the uptake of research and policies into healthcare delivery to improve quality and outcomes. Genetic counselors are uniquely positioned as the implementers of genomic medicine, with many seeking to learn about and incorporate IS into genetic counseling education and practice. We propose that genetic counselors can utilize IS in many areas of their practice and research, such as when applying new evidence or integrating guidelines into practice and when leading or assisting with quality improvement or research projects. Our goal with this paper is to provide a general overview of IS and to introduce the basics of theories, models, and frameworks, study designs and methods, and measuring IS outcomes. In addition, we briefly discuss IS tools useful for understanding and eliminating disparities and inequities, and how IS can assist genetic counselors with policy or clinical guideline implementation. It is our belief that incorporating IS tools into practice and teaching IS approaches will add to the value of genetic counselors. To that end, our hope is that this paper becomes a starting point for the integration of IS into the profession to improve the impact of our services in every context, demonstrate the value we add in the practice of genomic medicine, and contribute to the growth and evolution of our profession.

Indexed as

Genetic CounselingImplementation ScienceHumansgenetic counselingimplementation science

Identifiers

PMID40305162
PMCPMC12043043

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.