Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40305239›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2025

What are patient perspectives on privacy and trust in digital genomic tools? A qualitative study.

Vedika Jha, Saumeh Saeedi, Marc Clausen, Daniel Assamad, Sonya Grewal, Daena Hirjikaka, Whiwon Lee, Stephanie Luca, Angela Shaw, Robin Hayeems and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Vedika JhaTemerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0201-1999
Saumeh SaeediGenomics Health Services Research Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Marc ClausenGenomics Health Services Research Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Daniel AssamadProgram in Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sonya GrewalGenomics Health Services Research Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Daena HirjikakaGenomics Health Services Research Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Whiwon LeeProgram in Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Stephanie LucaProgram in Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Angela ShawGenomics Health Services Research Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Robin HayeemsProgram in Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Yvonne BombardGenomics Health Services Research Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Genetics Navigator Study Team

Funding

CIHR PNN 177934McLaughlin Centre, University of Toronto PMJ 175409
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital tools have emerged as a promising solution to increase the efficiency and capacity of genomic services. However, accessing information through internet-based applications raises concerns about privacy and security risks. As patient-facing digital tools are developed for genomic medicine, it is vital to understand and incorporate patients' perspectives on digital privacy and security. A qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews and interpretive description. Thirty participants who previously received genetic testing for themselves (n = 17) or their child (n = 13) were interviewed (n = 20 females, n = 15 above 50 years old). Participants were willing to store and access genomics personal health information (PHI) in a patient-facing digital platform. The main benefit identified by participants was the ability to access and control their own PHI. Participants expressed that the benefits of digital genomics services, such as patient empowerment and personalized care, outweighed the perceived risks, such as potential data leaks. In order to minimize risks, participants emphasized the importance of transparency about the security measures in place and who would have access to their PHI. These findings inform the design of digital genomic platforms to enhance patients' sense of security, which is critical for the uptake and usage of any platform.

Indexed as

Genetic PrivacyGenomicsTrustAgedComputer SecurityFemaleGenetic TestingHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Researchdigital healthgenetics servicesgenomicspatient attitudesprivacy

Identifiers

PMID40305239
PMCPMC12043032

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.