Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40307158›Full record

ReviewTrends in cancer2025

Tissue mechanics in tumor heterogeneity and aggression.

Anna-Marie Finger, Audrey Marie Hendley, Diego Figueroa, Hugo Gonzalez, Valerie Marie Weaver

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Amoeboid-mesenchymal transition and the proteolytic control of cancer invasion plasticity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Challenges and advances in drug resistance and tolerance in cancer.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2026
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anna-Marie FingerDepartment of Anatomy, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA 94143; Current address: Liver Disease Research, Global Drug Discovery, Novo Nordisk A/S, Malov, Denmark.
Audrey Marie HendleyCenter for Bioengineering and Tissue Regeneration, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA 94143.
Diego FigueroaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Hugo GonzalezDepartment of Anatomy, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA 94143; Current address: Laboratory of Tumor Microenvironment and Metastasis, Centro Ciencia & Vida, Santiago, Chile.
Valerie Marie WeaverCenter for Bioengineering and Tissue Regeneration, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA 94143; Department of Radiation Oncology, Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA. Electronic address: Valerie.Weaver@ucsf.edu.

Funding

Tissue mechanics reprograms the tissue to malignancy and metastasisR35CA242447 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI VALERIE MARIE WEAVER · 2020 to 2026
$6.6M
A physical sciences approach to investigate the role of exosomes in metastatic progressionU01CA250044 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GUO, WEI, RADHAKRISHNAN, RAVI · 2021 to 2025
$3.9M
Reorienting the Glioblastoma Microenvironment to Respond to ImmunotherapyR01NS109911 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BARCELLOS-HOFF, MARY HELEN, WEAVER, VALERIE MARIE · 2019 to 2023
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS R35 CA242447NCI NIH HHS U01 CA250044NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS109911
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumorigenesis ensues within a heterogeneous tissue microenvironment that promotes malignant transformation, metastasis and treatment resistance. A major feature of the tumor microenvironment is the heterogeneous population of cancer-associated fibroblasts and myeloid cells that stiffen the extracellular matrix. The heterogeneously stiffened extracellular matrix in turn activates cellular mechanotransduction and creates a hypoxic and metabolically hostile microenvironment. The stiffened extracellular matrix and elevated mechanosignaling also drive tumor aggression by fostering tumor cell growth, survival, and invasion, compromising antitumor immunity, expanding cancer stem cell frequency, and increasing mutational burden, which promote intratumor heterogeneity. Delineating the molecular mechanisms whereby tissue mechanics regulate these phenotypes should help to clarify the basis for tumor heterogeneity and cancer aggression and identify novel therapeutic targets that could improve patient outcome. Here, we discuss the role of the extracellular matrix in driving cancer aggression through its impact on tumor heterogeneity.

Indexed as

Extracellular MatrixMechanotransduction, CellularNeoplasmsTumor MicroenvironmentAnimalsCancer-Associated FibroblastsHumansNeoplastic Stem Cellscancer stem cellextracellular matrixmechanobiologymetastasisstiffnesstherapeutic resistancetumor heterogeneity

Identifiers

PMID40307158
PMCPMC12350075

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.