ArticleScientific reports2025
Prevalence and factors associated with organic dyspepsia in older adults with dyspepsia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of a Multicomponent Formulation: A Prospective Observational Study in Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Symptoms.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Functional Dyspepsia: An Updated Review of Pathophysiology, Epidemiology, Clinical Manifestations, and International Management Guidelines.Sage open pathologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to report findings from EGD investigations in older adults with dyspepsia and identify factors associated with organic dyspepsia in this population. We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study at a tertiary care center in Northern Thailand. Medical records of adults aged 50 years and older presenting with dyspepsia who underwent initial EGD between January 2018 and December 2022 were reviewed. Organic dyspepsia includes erosive esophagitis, ulcer, mass, and cancerous lesions. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with organic dyspepsia. Data from 466 patients were analyzed. Functional dyspepsia was the predominant diagnosis (94.0%), while organic dyspepsia was diagnosed in 6.0% of patients. Gastric/duodenal ulcer, erosive esophagitis, and gastric malignancy accounted for 1.9%, 1.7%, and 1.1% of cases, respectively. After adjustment for covariates, a low body mass index (BMI of less than 18.5 kg/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.