Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40307291›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Cross-national variation in faith sharing across religious traditions.

Robert D Woodberry, Matt Bradshaw, Tyler J Vander Weele, Byron R Johnson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Robert D WoodberryInstitute for Studies of Religion, Baylor University, One Bear Place 97236, Waco, TX, 76798, USA. Robert_Woodberry@baylor.edu.
Matt BradshawInstitute for Studies of Religion, Baylor University, One Bear Place 97236, Waco, TX, 76798, USA.
Tyler J Vander WeeleDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Byron R JohnsonInstitute for Studies of Religion, Baylor University, One Bear Place 97236, Waco, TX, 76798, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Who shares their faith with people who have different religious views? This article examines 'faith sharing' across 22 religiously diverse countries. To our knowledge, this is the first study of 'faith sharing' across national and religious contexts. Evangelism can be controversial, but both historically and in our data, it is widespread-including in societies that restrict religious liberty. 'Faith sharing' is lowest in Europe, Japan, Australia, and the US and highest in Africa, Latin America, the Middle East, and Asia (excluding Japan). Within countries, there is no consistent pattern about which religious groups share their faith more. Previous research about 'faith sharing' focuses on Christians in the US, but the factors that predict 'faith sharing' in the US often do not generalize. In fact, the association with age, education, marital status, employment status, and immigration status is exactly the opposite in many societies. Because past comparative research ignores this topic and because so much of what we think we know about faith sharing is based on US Christians, we hope this article will spur further research and expand our understanding of religious persuasion and global religious change.

Indexed as

Cross-Cultural ComparisonReligionAdultAustraliaChristianityFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited StatesConversionCross-nationalEvangelismProselytismReligious changeReligious dialogue

Identifiers

PMID40307291
PMCPMC12043944

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.