ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning frameworks to accurately estimate the adsorption of organic materials onto resin and biochar.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- HRSC advances · 2026Article
- Comparing machine learning and deep learning approaches to predicting the seismic response of slab-column connections.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Integrating chemical modification pathways and machine learning for optimization of nitrate removal by rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) biochar.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Integrating artificial intelligence with kinetic studies for Cr(vi) removal using young durian fruit biochar: a random forest regressor approach.RSC advances · 2025Article
- Evaluation of mesoporous silica synthesized for green adsorption by modeling via machine learning and mass transfer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adsorption prediction of organic components on biochar and resins is essential for advancing industrial and energy technologies. This study utilized a dataset of 1750 adsorption isotherms comprising adsorption data for 73 organic materials on 50 biochar samples and 30 polymer resins. Machine learning models were developed using eight input parameters, including five Abraham solvation descriptors, total pore volume (Vt), specific surface area (BET), and equilibrium concentration (logCe), with the output parameter being adsorption degree (logKd). The dataset was split into training (1225 data points), testing (262), and validation (263). Various machine learning methods were evaluated, including Linear Regression, Ridge Regression, Lasso Regression, Elastic Net, Support Vector Regression (SVR), k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Decision Trees, Random Forests, Gradient Boosting Machines, Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), Gaussian Processes, as well as ensemble algorithms such as XGBoost, LightGBM, and CatBoost. Among these, XGBoost achieved superior accuracy with an R² of 0.974 and a mean squared error (MSE) of 0.0343, followed by LightGBM (R²=0.964, MSE = 0.0484) and CatBoost (R²=0.984, MSE = 0.0212). Simpler models such as Linear Regression and Elastic Net showed lower performance, with R² values ranging from 0.678 to 0.875 and higher MSE values. Sensitivity and SHAP analyses identified equilibrium concentration and specific surface area as the most critical factors influencing adsorption. The findings underscore the effectiveness of machine learning methods, particularly XGBoost, LightGBM, and CatBoost, in forecasting adsorption levels with high precision while offering actionable insights into key variables driving adsorption mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.