Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40307908›Full record

ArticleBMC medical genomics2025

Exploring the c.406 C > T variant in TNNI3 gene: pathogenic insights into restrictive cardiomyopathy.

Tannaz Masoumi, Hamed Hesami, Majid Maleki, Samira Kalayinia

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tannaz Masoumi *Rajaie Cardiovascular Institute, Tehran, Iran.
Hamed Hesami *Rajaie Cardiovascular Institute, Tehran, Iran.
Majid MalekiCardiogenetic Research Center, Rajaie Cardiovascular Institute, Tehran, Iran.
Samira KalayiniaCardiogenetic Research Center, Rajaie Cardiovascular Institute, Tehran, Iran. samira.kalayi@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRestrictive cardiomyopathy (RCM) is a rare cardiac disorder characterized by diastolic dysfunction and myocardial stiffness, frequently associated with genetic variants. We aimed to explore the genetic basis of RCM in a diagnosed patient through comprehensive genetic analysis.

methodsWhole exome sequencing (WES) was conducted on the proband, followed by Sanger sequencing for variant confirmation and familial segregation analysis. In silico tools and structural protein modeling were employed to assess the functional impact of the identified variant.

resultsThe c.406 C > T variant, classified as likely pathogenic, results in a truncated TNNI3 protein. Bioinformatics analysis highlighted significant structural disruptions, likely impairing sarcomere function. The patient presented with growth retardation, progressive dyspnea, and echocardiographic findings consistent with RCM. Both parents were heterozygous carriers, supporting an autosomal recessive inheritance pattern. The homozygosity of the novel variant identified in this study is a critical factor in the genotype-phenotype correlation observed in this case.

conclusionThis study identified the novel c.406 C > T variant in TNNI3 as a potential pathogenic driver of RCM, emphasizing the critical role of genetic evaluations in early diagnosis and management of inherited cardiomyopathies. Further studies are warranted to explore therapeutic interventions targeting TNNI3-related pathologies.

Indexed as

Cardiomyopathy, RestrictiveTroponin IExome SequencingFemaleHumansMalePedigreeTNNI3 protein, humanTroponin IMutationRestrictive cardiomyopathyTNNI3VariantWhole exome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID40307908
PMCPMC12044743

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.