ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Artificial intelligence-assisted RNA-binding protein signature for prognostic stratification and therapeutic guidance in breast cancer.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cancer in transition: discovery of tumor-intrinsic transcriptional programs shaping the immune and microenvironmental landscape.Biomarker research · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence for the Diagnosis and Management of Cancers: Potentials and Challenges.MedComm · 2025Review
- Evaluating AI-driven precision oncology for breast cancer in low- and middle-income countries: a review of machine learning performance, genomic data use, and clinical feasibility.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women globally, with significant heterogeneity affecting prognosis and treatment. RNA-binding proteins play vital roles in tumor progression, yet their prognostic potential remains unclear. This study introduces an Artificial Intelligence-Assisted RBP Signature (AIRS) model to improve prognostic accuracy and guide personalized treatment. Methods: Data from 14 BC cohorts (9,000+ patients) were analyzed using 108 machine learning model combinations. The AIRS model, built on three key RBP genes (PGK1, MPHOSPH10, MAP2K6), stratified patients into high- and low-risk groups. Genomic alterations, single-cell transcriptomics, tumor microenvironment characteristics, and drug sensitivity were assessed to uncover AIRS-associated mechanisms. Results: The AIRS model demonstrated superior prognostic performance, surpassing 106 established signatures. High AIRS scores correlated with elevated tumor mutational burden, specific copy number alterations, and an immune-suppressive TME. Single-cell analysis revealed functional heterogeneity in epithelial cells, linking high AIRS scores to pathways like transcription factor binding. Regulatory network analysis identified key transcription factors such as MYC. Low AIRS scores predicted better responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors, while drug sensitivity analysis highlighted panobinostat and paclitaxel as potential therapies for high-risk patients. Conclusions: The AIRS model offers a robust tool for BC prognosis and treatment stratification, integrating genomic, transcriptomic, and single-cell data. It provides actionable insights for personalized therapy, paving the way for improved clinical outcomes. Future studies should validate findings across diverse populations and expand functional analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.