ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Leveraging a disulfidptosis-based signature to characterize heterogeneity and optimize treatment in multiple myeloma.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A disulfidptosis-related gene signature predicts prognosis and immune-metabolic landscape in multiple myeloma.British journal of haematology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Disulfidptosis is an emerging type of programmed cell death related to ROS accumulation and aberrant disulfide bond formation. Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most prevalent hematologic malignancy characterized by a high synthesis rate of disulfide bond-rich proteins and chronic oxidative stress. However, the relationship between disulfidptosis and MM is still unclear. Methods: Using the non-negative matrix factorization and lasso algorithm, we constructed the disulfidptosis-associated subtypes and the prognostic model on the GEO dataset. We further explored genetic mutation mapping, protein-protein interactions, functional enrichment, drug sensitivity, drug prediction, and immune infiltration analysis among subtypes and risk subgroups. To improve the clinical benefits, we combined risk scores and clinical metrics to build a nomogram. Finally, Results: By cluster analysis, we obtained three subtypes with C2 having a worse prognosis than C3. Consistently, C2 exhibited significantly lower sensitivity to doxorubicin and lenalidomide, as well as a higher propensity for T-cell depletion and a non-responsive state to immunotherapy. Similarly, in the subsequent prognostic model, the high-scoring group had a worse prognosis and a higher probability of T-cell dysfunction, immunotherapy resistance, and cancer cell self-renewal. DRGs and risk genes were widely mutated in cancers. Subtypes and risk subgroups differed in ROS metabolism and the p53 signaling pathway. We further identified eight genes differentially expressed in risk subgroups as drug targets against MM. Then 27 drugs targeting the high-risk group were predicted. Based on the DRGs and risk genes, we constructed the miRNA and TF regulatory networks. The nomogram of combined ISS, age, and risk score showed good predictive performance. qRT-PCR of cell lines and clinical specimens provided further support for prognostic modeling. Conclusion: Our research reveals the prognostic value of disulfidptosis in MM and provides new perspectives for identifying heterogeneity and therapeutic targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.