Article3D printing and additive manufacturing2025
Designing with Printed Responsive Biomaterials: A Review.
Article in 3D printing and additive manufacturing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Gynecologic postoperative anti-adhesion barriers: From biomaterials to barrier development.Biomaterials and biosystems · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review explores additive manufacturing (AM) strategies across disciplines for designing with responsive biomaterials and presents a vision of how printed responsive biomaterials (PRBs) can be integrated into everyday objects and buildings to enhance environmental and human health. Advancements in biomaterials science, biological materials manufacturing, synthetic biology, biomedical engineering, bio design, and living architecture are ushering in a new era characterized by multisensory interactions within everyday products and built environments. The material systems developed in recent research demonstrate the ability to interact with their environments through biological, chemical, or physical processes, yielding functionalities desirable in daily-use products. These include self-healing, health diagnostics, pathogen neutralization, adjustable stiffness, strain detection, threat visualization, shapeshifting, toxin trapping, stress correction, waste processing, and energy generation. Here we review examples of AM of biobased environmentally interactive materials using biopolymer composites, electrochemical and resistive devices, active molecules, bio sensors, living cells, spores, or cell-free sites, resulting in genetically active, and physical and chemical interactive systems. We highlight their robustness and evaluate their potential for scaling up into designs and architectures on Earth and beyond.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.