Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40309203›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2025

Depersonalisation-derealisation as a transdiagnostic treatment target: a scoping review of the evidence in anxiety, depression, and psychosis.

Emma Černis, Milan Antonović, Roya Kamvar, Joe Perkins, Transdiagnostic DPDR Project Lived Experience Advisory Panel

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emma ČernisSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Milan AntonovićSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Roya KamvarThe McPin Foundation, London, United Kingdom.
Joe PerkinsIndependent Researcher, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Transdiagnostic DPDR Project Lived Experience Advisory Panel

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Depersonalisation and derealisation (DPDR) describe dissociative experiences involving distressing feelings of disconnection from oneself or one's surroundings. Such experiences are common transdiagnostically across the range of mental health presentations, with evidence to suggest they may even play an active role in the development and maintenance of other mental health concerns. If substantiated, DPDR could present a plausible novel transdiagnostic treatment target. The objective of this scoping review was to therefore to synthesise the evidence-base regarding DPDR as a transdiagnostic target for the treatment of anxiety, depression, and psychosis, in order to evaluate this proposal for each. Methods: Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, APA PsychInfo, Scopus, and PubMed were searched for empirical published research and "grey" literature addressing transdiagnostic DPDR and primary anxiety, depression, or psychotic disorders (time range: 1993 to 12th October 2023). Extracted data were summarised and provided to the Lived Experience Advisory Panel for interpretation and analysis. Results: We screened 3,740 records, resulting in 42 studies addressing DPDR in the context of psychosis, 28 in anxiety, and 24 in depression. The results indicate that transdiagnostic DPDR is highly likely to be a viable treatment target in psychosis, and that it may share common cognitive processes with anxiety disorders. Evidence for the feasibility of DPDR as a treatment target in depression was sparse, and thus inconclusive. Discussion: Whilst no established interventions targeting transdiagnostic DPDR were identified by this review, its findings highlight many viable options for treatment development. Given the difficulty drawing clinically meaningful conclusions from the current evidence-base, we strongly recommend that this work actively involves people with lived experience of DPDR. Systematic review registration: https://osf.io/ufbkn/.

Indexed as

anxietydepersonalizationdepressionderealizationdissociationinterventionpsychosistreatment

Identifiers

PMID40309203
PMCPMC12042760

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.