ArticleUltrasound international open2025
Fetomaternal Doppler sonography for the prediction of perinatal outcome in term pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus: does it have potential?
Article in Ultrasound international open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Across the Perinatal Continuum: A Narrative Review of Woman-Centered, Holistic Care Models.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Lack of Association Between Middle Cerebral Artery Diastolic Deceleration Area and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Prospective Case-Control Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Little is known about the benefit and interpretation of fetomaternal Doppler sonography in GDM for the prediction of an adverse perinatal outcome (APO). The aim of this study was to examine the performance of fetomaternal Doppler for APO prediction in pregnancies with GDM at term. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of singleton, non-anomalous fetuses of women with GDM, who primarily had a vaginal delivery attempt. Study inclusion also required no other major fetomaternal abnormalities that make placental dysfunction likely. Data on fetomaternal Doppler sonography including umbilical artery pulsatility index (PI), middle cerebral artery (MCA) PI, cerebroplacental ratio (CPR), mean uterine artery PI, cerebro-placental-uterine ratio (CPUR) was collected from 37+0 weeks on. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed using maternal characteristics, neonatal characteristics, and Doppler ultrasound parameters as independent variables with CAPO as a binary outcome. Results: A total of n=88 cases were included. Nulliparity (p=0.032) and CPUR (p=0.052) were independent predictors of CAPO. However, CPUR had borderline significance. All other Doppler indices were not independent predictors of CAPO. The ability of CPUR alone (AUC=0.65, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.80) to discriminate between GDM pregnancies with and without CAPO was poor. Conclusion: This study shows that there is no significant clinical relationship between fetomaternal Doppler indices and CAPO among pregnancies with GDM. This raises the question regarding the extent to which fetomaternal Doppler indices, which reflect placental function, can be helpful for CAPO prediction in GDM pregnancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.