ArticleNigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association
Perception of Enrollee Health Insurance Fraud among Healthcare Workers at a Tertiary Hospital in Kaduna State, North-western Nigeria.
Article in Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Fraud in healthcare is an immense challenge that poses a direct threat to sustainable healthcare financing across low and high-income countries. Enrollee health insurance fraud is a relatively understudied form of fraud that thrives in settings characterized by weak and fragmented healthcare systems. This study examined the knowledge and perception of enrollee health insurance fraud among healthcare workers at a tertiary hospital in Kaduna State, North-western Nigeria. Methodology: Using a stratified sampling technique, 232 healthcare workers were interviewed using a structured, self-administered questionnaire that was developed for the study. Data on knowledge and perception of enrollee fraud was obtained and analysed using IBM SPSS Statistics. The data was presented using frequency distribution tables, while figures were drawn using Microsoft Excel. Results: The majority of the respondents were clinical staff, including medical doctors (29.7%), nurses (31.5%) and health assistants (14.2%). A total of170 (73.3%) respondents were aware of enrollee fraud and up to 113 (66.5%) encountered at least one case of enrollee fraud. The most common types of enrollee fraud identified by the respondents were impersonation (67.7%) and faking symptoms (57.1%). Respondents recognised adverse consequences of enrollee fraud, including depletion of resources (74.1%), blocking eligible patients from accessing care (73.6%), and exhaustion of healthcare workers (61.8%). A total of 111 (65.3%) agreed that enrollee fraud is common in the hospital and despite a high level of awareness, only 72 (42.3%) agreed that they are adequately informed about enrollee fraud. Conclusion: There was a high level of awareness of enrollee fraud among the respondents with a good perception of its manifestations and implications on healthcare delivery. It is recommended that immediate steps be taken to educate healthcare workers and enhance their capacity to detect and deter enrollee fraud while investing in longterm strategic measures and technology-based solutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.