ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Hydrotherapy and acupressure in restless legs syndrome: results of a randomized, controlled, three-armed, pilot study (HYDRAC-study).
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hydrotherapy and acupressure for restless legs syndrome: results of a qualitative part of a randomized controlled exploratory study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Study objectives: Non-pharmacological interventions for restless legs syndrome (RLS) are frequently used, although scientific evidence remains limited. The study aimed to investigate the feasibility and effects of self-applied hydrotherapy and self-applied acupressure in patients with RLS. Methods: In a three-armed randomized single-center open exploratory pilot study, adults with moderate to severe RLS were randomly allocated to 6 weeks of daily hydrotherapy plus routine care (HT group), acupressure plus routine care (AP group), or routine care alone (RC group). Outcome measures included RLS symptom severity (IRLS), disease-specific quality of life (RLSQoL), the impression of change (PGI-C), health-related quality of life (SF-12), psychological outcomes (SGW-B, HADS, and GSE), and adherence and adverse events (AEs) after 6 and 12 weeks. Results: Fifty-four adults (mean age 57.5 ± 11.4 years, 63% women) were included. The study showed good feasibility with an 83% retention rate. After 6 weeks, baseline-adjusted mean IRLS scores were 19.8 (95% [16.4, 23.2]) for HT, 22.9 (19.2, 26.6) for AP, and 24.0 (20.8, 27.2) for RC. RLSQoL adjusted means were 65.3 (59.7, 70.9) for HT, 68.3 (62.3, 74.3) for AP, and 56.2 (50.9, 61.5) for RC, after 6 weeks. Both interventions were safe, with high adherence rates. Conclusion: Self-applied hydrotherapy and acupressure appear to be feasible and safe interventions for patients with RLS. This exploratory pilot study suggests potential benefits, though larger, well-designed confirmatory studies are needed to validate these findings. Clinical trial registration: This study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (number DRKS00029960) on August 09, 2022. https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00029960.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.