ArticleACS nano2025
Inverse Design Method with Enhanced Sampling for Complex Open Crystals: Application to Novel Zeolite Self-assembly.
Article in ACS nano, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Inverse Thermodynamics: Designing Interactions for Targeted Phase Behavior.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Optimizing the design and synthesis of complex crystal structures presents pivotal opportunities and challenges in materials design. While recent computational advances in inverse design have proven effective for simpler crystals, their extension to intricate structures such as zeolites remains challenging. In this work, we introduce an efficient and robust inverse design workflow specifically tailored for the predictive design of a broad range of complex phases. By integrating an evolutionary parameter optimization strategy with enhanced sampling molecular dynamics simulations, this approach effectively surmounts the high energy barriers that typically hinder self-assembly in these complex structures. We apply this inverse design workflow to facilitate the efficient self-assembly of target zeolite frameworks in an efficient coarse-grained model of a tetrahedral network-forming component and a structure-directing agent. Using this method, we not only successfully reproduce the self-assembly of known structures like the Z1 and SGT zeolites and Type-I clathrates but also uncover previously unknown optimal design parameters for SOD and CFI zeolites. Remarkably, our approach also leads to the discovery of an uncatalogued framework, which we designate as Z5. Our methodology not only enables the screening and optimization of self-assembly protocols but also expands the possibilities for discovering hypothetical structures, driving innovation in materials design and offering a robust tool for advancing crystal engineering in complex systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.