ArticleJACC. Advances2025
Moving Beyond the Perfect Donor: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Optimizing Donor Utilization.
Article in JACC. Advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Behavioral Intelligence in Action: Implementation Science and Cardiovascular Learning Health Systems.JACC. Advances · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite a growing demand for donor hearts, more than two-thirds of viable hearts are discarded in North America. Our initiative sought to improve donor heart utilization by reviewing institutional donor acceptance practices and implementing targeted interventions.
objectivesOur aim was to increase donor heart utilization rate to 20% and reduce the rate of missed viable opportunities to ≤10% within a 12-month period, and assess the incidence of primary graft dysfunction preintervention and postintervention.
methodsThis prospective single-center study included all donor heart offers from January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2023. Donor demographics, clinical data, and utilization outcomes were collected. Missed viable opportunities were defined by criteria including left ventricular ejection fraction >50%, age <45 years, ischemic time <4 hours, and ≤20% undersizing by predicted heart mass. In January 2023, we launched a dashboard to track and display real-time utilization rates, held a Vanguard international speaker series, and introduced cardiologist/surgeon donor report cards.
resultsBefore the interventions (January 2021-December 2022), 54 of 436 (12.4%) donor offers were utilized; postintervention (January 2023-December 2023), 43 out of 233 offers (18.5%) were utilized (P = 0.038). Missed viable opportunities decreased from 19.3% (2021-2022) to 8.6% (2023) (P < 0.001). Additionally, there was a trend toward reduction in severe primary graft dysfunction (26% vs 12%, P = 0.121) postintervention.
conclusionsOur interdisciplinary, multipronged interventions doubled our donor heart utilization rate and significantly reduced missed viable opportunities without compromising short-term heart transplant recipient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.