Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40310672›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

Multimodal Visualization and Explainable Machine Learning-Driven Markers Enable Early Identification and Prognosis Prediction for Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis and Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Multicenter Cohort Study.

Jun Wang, Jiajun Zhu, Hui Li, Shili Wu, Siyang Li, Zhuoya Yao, Tongjian Zhu, Bi Tang, Shengxing Tang, Jinjun Liu

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. A multi-layer retrieval-augmented large language model framework for enhancing hypertension education.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jun Wang *Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7863-0331
Jiajun Zhu *Department of Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumchi, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0714-8579
Hui Li *Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9579-1921
Shili Wu *Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6656-8884
Siyang LiDepartment of Cardiology, Xiangyang Central Hospital, Xiangyang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8093-931X
Zhuoya YaoDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4336-7713
Tongjian Zhu *Department of Cardiology, Xiangyang Central Hospital, Xiangyang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7932-4950
Bi Tang *Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6059-6713
Shengxing Tang *Department of Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2700-5728
Jinjun Liu *Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1799-2708

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrently, there is a paucity of literature addressing personalized risk stratification using multimodal data in patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

objectiveThis study aimed to enhance the performance of risk assessment models in this patient population by developing a predictive model for adverse outcomes using various machine learning (ML) techniques.

methodsThis multicenter cohort study included 326 patients diagnosed with severe AS and HFpEF who underwent TAVR between January 2017 and December 2023. Patients were allocated to training (n=195) and independent validation (n=131) sets based on hospital affiliation. A dual-phase feature selection process, combining least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression and the Boruta algorithm, was used to identify relevant variables from the multimodal dataset. A total of 5 ML model-decision trees, K-nearest neighbors, random forest, support vector machine, and extreme gradient boosting were used to construct a visualization and explainable predictive framework to elucidate model decision-making processes.

resultsThe primary features identified included age, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, fasting blood glucose, triglyceride/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio, triglyceride glucose index, triglyceride glucose-BMI index, atherogenic index of plasma index, and Apolipoprotein B. Among the 5 models, the support vector machine demonstrated the best predictive performance for major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in patients with severe AS and HFpEF following TAVR, achieving an area under the curve of 0.756 (95% CI 0.631-0.881) in the independent validation set. The model exhibited good calibration and robust predictive power in both training and validation sets and demonstrated the highest net benefit in decision curve analysis compared to other models. To extract significant variables influencing the algorithm and ensure model appropriateness, we interpreted cohort and personalized model predictions using Shapley Additive Explanations values.

conclusionsOur ML-based multimodal model, incorporating 8 readily accessible predictors, demonstrated robust predictive capability for 12 months of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events risk. This model can be used to identify high-risk individuals with AS and HFpEF following TAVR, potentially aiding in risk stratification and personalized treatment strategies.

Indexed as

Aortic Valve StenosisHeart FailureMachine LearningTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMalePrognosisRisk AssessmentStroke VolumeBiomarkersheart failure with preserved ejection fractioninterpretable modelsmachine learningmajor adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events.symptomatic aortic stenosistranscatheter aortic valve replacement

Identifiers

PMID40310672
PMCPMC12082054

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.