ReviewFertility and sterility2025
Chromosome defects and male factor infertility.
Review in Fertility and sterility, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Correlation between reproductive hormone levels and genetic abnormalities in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia and oligospermia.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Dietary glycemic index, glycemic load, carbohydrate quality index, and low-carbohydrate diet score and their association with sperm DNA damage in unexplained male infertility.Genes & nutrition · 2026Article
- Quantitative analysis of vitamin E, 5-methyltetrahydrofolate, and glutathione in seminal plasma by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.Frontiers in chemistry · 2026Article
- Genetic and Epigenetic Risks of Male Infertility in ART.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Chromosomal Roadblocks in Male Fertility: Mechanisms, Risk Factors and Syndromes.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Although a routine semen analysis and an endocrine evaluation (usually of the gonadotropins and androgen levels) are the cornerstone of clinical diagnostic evaluation of the male seeking evaluation and treatment of the couple with infertility, in recent years, the American Urological Association/American Society for Reproductive Medicine Practice Guidelines for Male Infertility stressed the importance of assessing chromosomal anomalies, such as numerical and structural anomalies in men with spermatogenic failure. This narrative review of chromosomal anomalies as a cause of male factor infertility will provide an understanding of the technical approaches to defining the defects, as well as the clinical consequences of these abnormalities for a wider group of men with infertility. Karyotype anomalies are a significant cause of male factor infertility and are present in approximately 6% of men with infertility. These cytogenetic anomalies include numerical defects that underlie conditions such as Klinefelter syndrome, which is among the most overlooked diagnosis in reproductive medicine, and other sex chromosome aneuploidies. Structural chromosomal defects are more varied and complex and include chromosomal translocations, inversions, insertions, and copy number variations, some of which result in spermatogenic failure, oligozoospermia, asthenozoospermia, or even normozoospermia. Other structural defects affect pregnancy outcomes or health of the offspring conceived or cause birth defects. The criteria needed for a chromosomal assessment for the diagnosis male factor infertility should probably be expanded beyond the existing American Urological Association/American Society for Reproductive Medicine Practice Guidelines. Their recommendation that a karyotype be performed for the evaluation of men with nonobstructive azoospermia and men with severe oligozoospermia (<5 million sperm/mL) is solid; however, the prevalence of cytogenetic anomalies in men with sperm counts below 20 million sperm/mL is also increased compared with fertile men who would not be likely to be tested. Karyotypic anomalies are even present in a subset of men with infertility with normozoospermia. A karyotype can also detect structural chromosomal anomalies, such as translocations that impact male reproductive function and the health of the offspring. Advanced technologies to identify microdeletions and microduplications can also guide patient care. Knowledge of the etiology of the male's infertility may impact the couple's treatment options and improve their reproductive outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.