Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40311997›Full record

ReviewFertility and sterility2025

Chromosome defects and male factor infertility.

Dolores J Lamb

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Fertility and sterility, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Genetic and Epigenetic Risks of Male Infertility in ART.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Dolores J LambDivision of Pediatric Urology, Department of Surgery, Children's Research Institute, Children's Mercy Hospital and University of Missouri School of Medicine-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri. Electronic address: djlamb@cmh.edu.

Funding

DNA Repair Deficiencies in Infertile Men and Cancer RiskR01CA290670 · NCI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI Dolores Jean Lamb · 2024 to 2026
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA290670
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although a routine semen analysis and an endocrine evaluation (usually of the gonadotropins and androgen levels) are the cornerstone of clinical diagnostic evaluation of the male seeking evaluation and treatment of the couple with infertility, in recent years, the American Urological Association/American Society for Reproductive Medicine Practice Guidelines for Male Infertility stressed the importance of assessing chromosomal anomalies, such as numerical and structural anomalies in men with spermatogenic failure. This narrative review of chromosomal anomalies as a cause of male factor infertility will provide an understanding of the technical approaches to defining the defects, as well as the clinical consequences of these abnormalities for a wider group of men with infertility. Karyotype anomalies are a significant cause of male factor infertility and are present in approximately 6% of men with infertility. These cytogenetic anomalies include numerical defects that underlie conditions such as Klinefelter syndrome, which is among the most overlooked diagnosis in reproductive medicine, and other sex chromosome aneuploidies. Structural chromosomal defects are more varied and complex and include chromosomal translocations, inversions, insertions, and copy number variations, some of which result in spermatogenic failure, oligozoospermia, asthenozoospermia, or even normozoospermia. Other structural defects affect pregnancy outcomes or health of the offspring conceived or cause birth defects. The criteria needed for a chromosomal assessment for the diagnosis male factor infertility should probably be expanded beyond the existing American Urological Association/American Society for Reproductive Medicine Practice Guidelines. Their recommendation that a karyotype be performed for the evaluation of men with nonobstructive azoospermia and men with severe oligozoospermia (<5 million sperm/mL) is solid; however, the prevalence of cytogenetic anomalies in men with sperm counts below 20 million sperm/mL is also increased compared with fertile men who would not be likely to be tested. Karyotypic anomalies are even present in a subset of men with infertility with normozoospermia. A karyotype can also detect structural chromosomal anomalies, such as translocations that impact male reproductive function and the health of the offspring. Advanced technologies to identify microdeletions and microduplications can also guide patient care. Knowledge of the etiology of the male's infertility may impact the couple's treatment options and improve their reproductive outcomes.

Indexed as

Chromosome AberrationsFertilityInfertility, MaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansKaryotypingMaleclinical impactdiagnosisinterpretation of diagnosisMale infertility

Identifiers

PMID40311997
PMCPMC13508826

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.