Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40312286›Full record

ArticleThe Medical journal of Australia2025

Urgent care centres for reducing the demand on emergency departments: a scoping review of published quantitative and qualitative studies.

Feby Savira, Madison Frith, Clarissa J Aditya, Sean Randall, Naomi White, Andrew Giddy, Lauren Spark, Jamie Swann, Suzanne Robinson

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in The Medical journal of Australia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Feby SaviraInstitute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC.ORCID 0000-0002-0383-812X
Madison FrithInstitute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC.
Clarissa J AdityaInstitute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC.
Sean RandallInstitute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC.
Naomi WhiteWestern Victoria Primary Health Network, Ballarat, VIC.
Andrew GiddyWestern Victoria Primary Health Network, Ballarat, VIC.
Lauren SparkMelbourne, VIC.
Jamie SwannWestern Victoria Primary Health Network, Ballarat, VIC.
Suzanne RobinsonInstitute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC.

Funding

Western Victoria Primary Health Network
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo identify published studies that examined the impact of urgent care centres on the numbers of presentations to emergency departments (EDs), or explored the experiences and views of patients and practitioners regarding urgent care centres as alternative sources of health care and advice. STUDY

designScoping review of qualitative and quantitative studies published to 28 August 2024. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PsycINFO, and CINAHL databases; grey literature searches. DATA SYNTHESIS: Of 2698 potentially relevant publications, 51 met our inclusion criteria (30 quantitative studies; 21 qualitative studies). Urgent care centres of various types were led by general practitioners in 41 of 51 studies, primarily managed people with non-urgent conditions or minor illnesses in 34 studies and non-emergency but urgent conditions in eight, and nine of the 22 studies that discussed funding indicated that access to the centres was free of charge. The effect of urgent care centres on ED presentation numbers was mixed; all seven studies of after-hours clinics, one of two studies of 24-hour clinics, and four of five studies of walk-in centres reported reduced ED visit numbers; in eleven studies that reported effects on hospital admissions from the ED, they were lower in seven (studies of an urgent cancer care centre, four community health centres, and a general practitioner cooperative). Patient satisfaction with urgent care centres is generally as high as with other primary care services; they preferred them to EDs, and preferred personal triage to telephone triage. Reasons for people choosing urgent care centres included easier access and the unavailability of doctors or appointments elsewhere. Clinicians reported increased workload, mixed experiences with the coordination of care, concerns about unregistered or undocumented people using the services, and protocol confusion, particularly with respect to triage. Continuity of care was a concern for both clinicians and patients.

conclusionsUrgent care centres, especially walk-in and after-hours clinics, can help reduce the number of ED presentations and reduce health care costs. Patient satisfaction with such clinics is high, but public health education could guide people to appropriate care for non-urgent health problems. Training in the management of conditions frequently seen in urgent care centres is needed to ensure consistent, effective care.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Care FacilitiesEmergency Service, HospitalHealth Services Needs and DemandAustraliaHealth Services AccessibilityHumansPatient SatisfactionQualitative ResearchEmergency servicesmedicalPrimary health care

Identifiers

PMID40312286
PMCPMC12088314

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.