ArticleBMC pediatrics2025
Single-incision versus conventional multiport laparoscopic-assisted surgery for Meckel's diverticulum in children: a single-center propensity score analysis.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing enhanced recovery after surgery protocols for pediatric laparoscopic-assisted small intestinal malformation repair.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- A case of Meckel's diverticulum misdiagnosed as gastrointestinal stromal tumor: case report and literature review.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMeckel's diverticulum (MD) is the most common congenital anomaly of the small intestine, and often leads to various complications in children. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) in the treatment of MD in children.
methodsRetrospective review of patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for MD at a tertiary pediatric hospital from February 2017 to February 2023 was conducted with registered of demographic information, preoperative laboratory results, operative findings, and postoperative outcomes. Based on the surgical strategy, patients were classified into SILS and CLS groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to adjust for confounding factors, resulting in 188 matched pairs. Using PSM, the two groups were compared for baseline differences and postoperative outcomes.
resultsOf the 561 patients, the SILS-to-CLS ratio was 301: 260. After one-to-one PSM, results showed that compared with the CLS group, the SILS group had a significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.004), and earlier excretion time and fasting time (P < 0.05). Furthermore, SILS resulted in better scar assessment and higher satisfaction score (both P < 0.05). The two groups had no significant differences in the rates of postoperative complications (P = 0.439) and readmission (P = 0.291). Conversion to open surgery was more common in the SILS group (10.6%) than in the CLS group (6.4%), although this difference was not statistically significant after matching (P = 0.139).
conclusionOur study aimed to determine the superiority of SILS over CLS in the treatment of pediatric MD. SILS offers distinct advantages over CLS in managing MD in children, including shorter hospital stays and bowel function recovery, without increasing postoperative complications. These findings suggest that SILS may be a preferable approach, warranting its integration into standard clinical practice for MD treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.