Trial reportScientific reports2025
Efficacy and safety of givosiran in Japanese patients with acute hepatic porphyria: clinical findings from an expanded access study.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute hepatic porphyria (AHP), a rare genetic disorder, causes life-threatening porphyria attacks and chronic pain and impairs daily functioning and quality of life. Recently, a new siRNA therapy, givosiran, became available for AHP. This open-label, multicenter, single-arm study expanded access to givosiran and further explored its safety and efficacy in 10 Japanese patients with AHP. Participants received monthly subcutaneous injections of givosiran (2.5 mg/kg). Three patients were continued from the phase III ENVISION study of givosiran, and seven were newly recruited. Assessments comprised clinical AHP features, urinary aminolevulinic acid (ALA) and porphobilinogen (PBG) levels, use of hemin to treat attacks, and the Givosiran Patient Experience Questionnaire (GPEQ). Urinary ALA and PBG levels remained at or below upper limits of normal levels throughout the study. The GPEQ showed symptomatic improvement in eight participants. Of the eight adverse events, five were deemed by the investigator to be related to givosiran. One patient experienced two attacks, which required urgent healthcare visits but no hemin use. Generally, the safety profile was consistent with that previously observed. All adverse events were nonserious, and no deaths occurred. The study indicates that monthly givosiran administration is safe and clinically useful in Japanese patients with AHP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.