ArticleBMC genomics2025
lute: estimating the cell composition of heterogeneous tissue with varying cell sizes using gene expression.
Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRelative cell type fraction estimates in bulk RNA-sequencing data are important to control for cell composition differences across heterogenous tissue samples. While there exist algorithms to estimate the cell type proportions in tissues, a major challenge is the algorithms can show reduced performance if using tissues that have varying cell sizes, such as in brain tissue. In this way, without adjusting for differences in cell sizes, computational algorithms estimate the relative fraction of RNA attributable to each cell type, rather than the relative fraction of cell types, leading to potentially biased estimates in cellular composition. Furthermore, these tools were built on different frameworks with non-uniform input data formats while addressing different types of systematic errors or unwanted bias.
resultsWe present lute, a software tool to accurately deconvolute cell types with varying sizes. Our package lute wraps existing deconvolution algorithms in a flexible and extensible framework to enable easy benchmarking and comparison of existing deconvolution algorithms. Using simulated and real datasets, we demonstrate how lute adjusts for differences in cell sizes to improve the accuracy of cell composition.
conclusionsOur software ( https://bioconductor.org/packages/lute ) can be used to enhance and improve existing deconvolution algorithms and can be used broadly for any type of tissue containing cell types with varying cell sizes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.