Evidence mapPaperPMID 40312903Full record

ArticleInvestigative and clinical urology2025

Can flexible ureteroscopy using flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS-UAS) minimize postoperative double J stent placement? Results from a propensity score-matched analysis of 540 patients of the European Association of Urology Section of Endourology and global FANS collaborative study group.

Daniele Castellani, Bhaskar Kumar Somani, Khi Yung Fong, Steffi Kar Kei Yuen, Chin Tiong Heng, Mohamed Elshazly, Karl Tan, Thomas R W Herrmann, Olivier Traxer, Vineet Gauhar

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative and clinical urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Daniele CastellaniUrology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7354-9190
Bhaskar Kumar SomaniEuropean Association of Urology Section of Endourology, Arnhem, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6248-6478
Khi Yung FongYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-8194-0800
Steffi Kar Kei YuenEuropean Association of Urology Section of Endourology, Arnhem, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9956-1558
Chin Tiong HengDepartment of Urology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-7925-1176
Mohamed ElshazlyUrology Unit, Menoufia University, Shibin el Kom, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0003-2331-2915
Karl TanDepartment of Surgery, Section of Urology, Veterans Memorial Medical Center, Quezon City, Philippines.ORCID 0000-0001-6870-2808
Thomas R W HerrmannEuropean Association of Urology Section of Endourology, Arnhem, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4493-1301
Olivier TraxerEuropean Association of Urology Section of Endourology, Arnhem, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2459-3803
Vineet GauharEuropean Association of Urology Section of Endourology, Arnhem, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3740-7141

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate whether using flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath can obviate insertion of double J stent and establish the safety of overnight ureteric catheter placement as alternative following flexible ureteroscopy for kidney stones. MATERIALS AND

methodsFive hundred forty adults were prospectively enrolled across 25 centers (from April 2023 to January 2024). Patients were divided into group 1 (overnight ureteric catheter), and group 2 (double J stent). Surgeons could choose either modality as per their discretion. One-to-one propensity score-matching for age, sex, pre-stenting, Hounsfield units, stone volume and location was performed. Thirty-day computed tomography scan was done to estimate stone-free status.

resultsAfter matching, 120 patients were included in each group. Group 1 had significantly shorter lasing, ureteroscopy, surgical time. Median day 1 loin pain score was similar (1 [1, 2] in both groups). Median postoperative stay was shorter in group 1 (0 days [0, 1] vs. 1 day [0, 2], p<0.001). One patient in group 2 required a blood transfusion. Incidence of fever was similar (5.0% vs. 0.8%). Loin/abdominal pain requiring medication occurred in one patient in group 2. Stent-related symptoms occurred in 2 patients in group 1. Three patients (2.5%) in group 1 and 2 patients (1.7%) in group 2 required readmission. Thirty-day stone-free status was higher in group 1 patients (79.2% vs. 56.7%).

conclusionsIn selected patients after thorough inspection to ensure no injury or residual fragments remain, placing an overnight ureteric catheter can be a safe alternative to a double J stent.

Indexed as

Kidney CalculiStentsUreteroscopyAdultAgedEquipment DesignFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPropensity ScoreProspective StudiesSuctionUreteroscopesKidney calculiLithotripsy, laserSuctionUreteroscopy

Identifiers

PMID40312903
PMCPMC12058539

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.