Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40312913›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2025

Dendritic synaptic integration modes under in vivo-like states.

Cesar C Ceballos, Rodrigo F O Pena

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cesar C CeballosDepartment of Biological Sciences, Florida Atlantic University, Jupiter, Florida.
Rodrigo F O PenaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Florida Atlantic University, Jupiter, Florida; Stiles-Nicholson Brain Institute, Florida Atlantic University, Jupiter, Florida. Electronic address: penar@fau.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The neural code remains undiscovered and understanding synaptic input integration under in vivo-like conditions is just the initial step toward unraveling it. Synaptic signals generate fast dendritic spikes through two main modes of temporal summation: coincidence detection and integration. In coincidence detection, dendrites fire only when multiple incoming signals arrive in rapid succession, whereas integration involves summation of postsynaptic potentials over longer periods with minimal membrane leakage. This process is influenced by ionic properties, especially as the membrane potential approaches the firing threshold, where inactivating currents play a critical role. However, the modulation of temporal summation by these currents under in vivo-like conditions has not been thoroughly studied. In our research, we used computer simulations of a single dendritic branch to investigate how three inactivating currents-A-type potassium, T-type calcium, and transient sodium-affect temporal summation. We found that calcium and sodium currents promote integrative behavior in dendrites, while potassium currents enhance their ability to act as coincidence detectors. By adjusting the levels of these currents in dendrites, neurons can flexibly switch between integration and coincidence detection modes, providing them with a versatile mechanism for complex tasks such as multiplexing. This flexibility could be key to understanding how neural circuits process information in real time.

Indexed as

DendritesModels, NeurologicalSynapsesAction PotentialsAnimalsCalciumComputer SimulationPotassiumSodiumCalciumPotassiumSodium

Identifiers

PMID40312913
PMCPMC12256912

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.