ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2025
Model-based self-supervised learning for quantitative assessment of myocardial oxygen extraction fraction and myocardial blood volume.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Quantitative assessment of cardiac phosphocreatine metabolism under physiological and pharmacological stress using chemical exchange saturation transfer magnetic resonance imaging.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic ResonanceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo develop a model-driven, self-supervised deep learning network for end-to-end simultaneous mapping of myocardial oxygen extraction fraction (mOEF) and myocardial blood volume (MBV).
methodsAn asymmetrical spin echo-prepared sequence was used to acquire mOEF and MBV images. By integrating a physical model into the training process, a self-supervised learning (SSL) pattern can be regulated. A loss function consisted of the mean squared error, plus cosine similarity was used to improve the performance of network predictions for estimating mOEF and MBV simultaneously. The SSL network was trained and evaluated using simulated data with ground truths and human data in vivo from 10 healthy subjects and 10 patients with myocardial infarction.
resultsIn the simulation study, the SSL method demonstrated the ability of generating relatively accurate mOEF, MBV, and ΔB maps simultaneously. In the in vivo study, healthy volunteers had an average mOEF of 0.6-0.7 and MBV of 0.11-0.13, comparable to literature-reported values. In the myocardial infarction regions, the average mOEF and MBV in 5 tested patients reduced to 0.45 ± 0.09 and 0.09 ± 0.02, which were significantly lower (p < 0.001) than those in normal regions (0.67 ± 0.04 and 0.13 ± 0.01, respectively).
conclusionThis work has demonstrated the initial feasibility of generating mOEF and MBV maps simultaneously by a model-driven, self-supervised learning method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.