ArticleNeural regeneration research2026
Short-lived Niemann-Pick type C mice with accelerated brain aging as a novel model for Alzheimer's disease research.
Article in Neural regeneration research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Rapamycin Pharmacogenomic Approach for the Childhood Dementia Niemann-Pick C.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2026Article
- Article
- APOE3 astrocytes can rescue lipid abnormalities and dystrophic neurites of APOE4 human neurons.PNAS nexus · 2026Article
- Review
- APOE3 astrocytes can rescue lipid abnormalities and dystrophic neurites of APOE4 human neurons.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
JOURNAL/nrgr/04.03/01300535-202606000-00068/figure1/v/2026-02-11T151048Z/r/image-tiff Alzheimer's disease is initially thought to be caused by age-associated accumulation of plaques, in recent years, research has increasingly associated Alzheimer's disease with lysosomal storage and metabolic disorders, and the explanation of its pathogenesis has shifted from amyloid and tau accumulation to oxidative stress and impaired lipid and glucose metabolism aggravated by hypoxic conditions. However, the underlying mechanisms linking those cellular processes and conditions to disease progression have yet to be defined. Here, we applied a disease similarity approach to identify unknown molecular targets of Alzheimer's disease by using transcriptomic data from congenital diseases known to increase Alzheimer's disease risk, namely Down syndrome, Niemann-Pick type C disease, and mucopolysaccharidoses I. We uncovered common pathways, hub genes, and miRNAs across in vitro and in vivo models of these diseases as potential molecular targets for neuroprotection and amelioration of Alzheimer's disease pathology, many of which have never been associated with Alzheimer's disease. We then investigated common molecular alterations in brain samples from a Niemann-Pick type C disease mouse model by juxtaposing them with brain samples of both human and mouse models of Alzheimer's disease. Detailed phenotypic, molecular, chronological, and biological aging analyses revealed that the Npc1tm(I1061T)Dso mouse model can serve as a potential short-lived in vivo model for brain aging and Alzheimer's disease research. This research represents the first comprehensive approach to congenital disease association with neurodegeneration and a new perspective on Alzheimer's disease research while highlighting shortcomings and lack of correlation in diverse in vitro models. Considering the lack of an Alzheimer's disease mouse model that recapitulates the physiological hallmarks of brain aging, the short-lived Npc1tm(I1061T)Dso mouse model can further accelerate the research in these fields and offer a unique model for understanding the molecular mechanisms of Alzheimer's disease from a perspective of accelerated brain aging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.