Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40313133›Full record

ArticleClinical trials (London, England)2025

Causal inference in randomized trials with partial clustering.

Joshua R Nugent, Elijah Kakande, Gabriel Chamie, Jane Kabami, Asiphas Owaraganise, Diane V Havlir, Moses Kamya, Laura B Balzer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical trials (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Joshua R NugentDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Pleasanton, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4479-9673
Elijah KakandeInfectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda.
Gabriel ChamieDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Jane KabamiInfectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda.
Asiphas OwaraganiseInfectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0002-5594-0310
Diane V HavlirDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Moses KamyaInfectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda.
Laura B BalzerDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.

Funding

Simplified Isoniazid Preventive Therapy (SPIRIT) Strategy to Reduce TB BurdenR01AI125000 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HAVLIR, DIANE V · 2017 to 2022
$3.9M
Mentorship in patient-oriented research to optimize community-based HIV prevention for adults at high-risk of HIV at alcohol drinking venues in East AfricaK24AA031211 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Gabriel Chamie · 2023 to 2026
$785k
NIAAA NIH HHS K24 AA031211NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI125000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParticipant dependence, if present, must be accounted for in the analysis of randomized trials. This dependence, also referred to as "clustering," can occur in one or more trial arms. This dependence may predate randomization or arise after randomization. We examine three trial designs: one "fully clustered" (where all participants are dependent within clusters or groups) and two "partially clustered" (where some participants are dependent within clusters and some participants are completely independent of all others).

methodsFor these three designs, we (1) use causal models to non-parametrically describe the data generating process and formalize the dependence in the observed data distribution; (2) develop a novel implementation of targeted minimum loss-based estimation for analysis; (3) evaluate the finite-sample performance of targeted minimum loss-based estimation and common alternatives via a simulation study; and (4) apply the methods to real-data from the SEARCH-IPT trial.

resultsWe show that the two randomization schemes resulting in partially clustered trials have the same dependence structure, enabling use of the same statistical methods for estimation and inference of causal effects. Our novel targeted minimum loss-based estimation approach leverages covariate adjustment and machine learning to improve precision and facilitates estimation of a large set of causal effects. In simulations, we demonstrate that targeted minimum loss-based estimation achieves comparable or markedly higher statistical power than common alternatives for these partially clustered designs. Finally, application of targeted minimum loss-based estimation to real data from the SEARCH-IPT trial resulted in 20%-57% efficiency gains, demonstrating the real-world consequences of our proposed approach.ConclusionsPartially clustered trial analysis can be made more efficient by implementing targeted minimum loss-based estimation, assuming care is taken to account for the dependent nature of the observed data.

Indexed as

Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignCausalityCluster AnalysisComputer SimulationData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansModels, StatisticalCluster-randomized trialsefficiencygroup-randomized trialsindividually randomized group treatment trialsmachine learningpartial clusteringtargeted learning

Identifiers

PMID40313133
PMCPMC12355196

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.