ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Antenatal group-based psychoeducation to improve postpartum depression literacy in primary health care institutions in Ethiopia: a cluster randomized controlled trial.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antenatal Depression Risk and Mental Health Literacy: A Correlational Study Among Second- and Third-Trimester Pregnancies.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Unseen and underserved: A scoping review of perinatal mental health interventions in Sub-Saharan Africa.PLOS mental health · 2026Article
- Positive psychological capital and antenatal depression: the chain-mediating roles of social support and maternal health literacy in rural China.BMC psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Postpartum depression literacy assists mothers in recognizing and preventing postpartum depression (PPD). So, this study assessed the effectiveness of antenatal group psychoeducation in improving PPD literacy among pregnant women in Jimma, Ethiopia. Methods: A cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted from 28 March to 1 December 2022 involving 32 non-adjusted health centers that were randomized into two groups (16 health centers for each arm). The study enrolled 550 participants who scored (0-9) on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. The intervention group received standard antenatal care and group psychoeducation, while the control group received only standard care. Postpartum depression literacy was assessed in face-to-face interviews at 12-20 weeks gestation and 6 weeks postpartum using the PPD literacy scale. Higher scores indicated higher literacy. An intention-to-treat analysis was used. Demographic factors were compared between groups using χ² and independent sample t-tests, indicating no significant differences except for educational status and parity. General linear models and mixed-effect models assessed intervention effects and outcome variable predictors, respectively. Results: The overall response rate was 92.9%. The study demonstrated a significant difference between groups regarding the overall mean PPD literacy score (intervention, 3.75 ± 0.46; control, 3.48 ± 0.46; ηp² = 0.07), ability to recognize PPD (intervention, 4.30 ± 0.64; control, 3.94 ± 0.75; ηp² = 0.06), knowledge of risk factors and causes (intervention, 4.03 ± 0.69; control, 3.67 ± 0.70; ηp² = 0.05), and access to PPD information (intervention, 3.28 ± 1.25; control, 2.01 ± 1.13; ηp ²= 0.21) at p = 0.001, with marginal significance regarding self-care activities (intervention 4.37 ± 0.54, control 4.26 ± 0.50, ηp² = 0.01, p = 0.051). Conversely, there were no significant differences in knowledge of professional help (intervention 2.97 ± 1.13, control 2.83 ± 0.80, p² = 0.00, p = 0.303), beliefs regarding professional help (intervention 2.67 ± 0.89, control 2.50 ± 0.72, p² = 0.01, p = 0.063), and attitudes toward PPD recognition and help seeking (intervention 3.91 ± 1.02, control 3.91 ± 1.02, p² = 0.00, p = 0.586). Moreover, partner emotional support (AOR = 0.1, 95% CI = 0.02-0.17), maladaptive coping [AOR = -0.14, 95% CI = -0.22-(-0.07)], and multiparty [AOR = -0.15, 95% CI = -0.22-(-0.08)] showed significant associations with overall PPD literacy score. Conclusions: The study showed that antenatal group psychoeducation had a moderate effect on overall PPD literacy score. However, further research is required to effectively change negative attitudes toward seeking formal help. Clinical Trial Registration: https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/, identifier PACTR 202203616584913.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.