Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40313240›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025

Antenatal group-based psychoeducation to improve postpartum depression literacy in primary health care institutions in Ethiopia: a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Marta Tessema, Muluemebet Abera, Zewdie Birhanu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marta TessemaSchool of Midwifery, Institute of Health, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Muluemebet AberaDepartment of Population and Family Health, Institute of Health, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Zewdie BirhanuDepartment of Health, Behavior and Society, Institute of Health, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Postpartum depression literacy assists mothers in recognizing and preventing postpartum depression (PPD). So, this study assessed the effectiveness of antenatal group psychoeducation in improving PPD literacy among pregnant women in Jimma, Ethiopia. Methods: A cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted from 28 March to 1 December 2022 involving 32 non-adjusted health centers that were randomized into two groups (16 health centers for each arm). The study enrolled 550 participants who scored (0-9) on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. The intervention group received standard antenatal care and group psychoeducation, while the control group received only standard care. Postpartum depression literacy was assessed in face-to-face interviews at 12-20 weeks gestation and 6 weeks postpartum using the PPD literacy scale. Higher scores indicated higher literacy. An intention-to-treat analysis was used. Demographic factors were compared between groups using χ² and independent sample t-tests, indicating no significant differences except for educational status and parity. General linear models and mixed-effect models assessed intervention effects and outcome variable predictors, respectively. Results: The overall response rate was 92.9%. The study demonstrated a significant difference between groups regarding the overall mean PPD literacy score (intervention, 3.75 ± 0.46; control, 3.48 ± 0.46; ηp² = 0.07), ability to recognize PPD (intervention, 4.30 ± 0.64; control, 3.94 ± 0.75; ηp² = 0.06), knowledge of risk factors and causes (intervention, 4.03 ± 0.69; control, 3.67 ± 0.70; ηp² = 0.05), and access to PPD information (intervention, 3.28 ± 1.25; control, 2.01 ± 1.13; ηp ²= 0.21) at p = 0.001, with marginal significance regarding self-care activities (intervention 4.37 ± 0.54, control 4.26 ± 0.50, ηp² = 0.01, p = 0.051). Conversely, there were no significant differences in knowledge of professional help (intervention 2.97 ± 1.13, control 2.83 ± 0.80, p² = 0.00, p = 0.303), beliefs regarding professional help (intervention 2.67 ± 0.89, control 2.50 ± 0.72, p² = 0.01, p = 0.063), and attitudes toward PPD recognition and help seeking (intervention 3.91 ± 1.02, control 3.91 ± 1.02, p² = 0.00, p = 0.586). Moreover, partner emotional support (AOR = 0.1, 95% CI = 0.02-0.17), maladaptive coping [AOR = -0.14, 95% CI = -0.22-(-0.07)], and multiparty [AOR = -0.15, 95% CI = -0.22-(-0.08)] showed significant associations with overall PPD literacy score. Conclusions: The study showed that antenatal group psychoeducation had a moderate effect on overall PPD literacy score. However, further research is required to effectively change negative attitudes toward seeking formal help. Clinical Trial Registration: https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/, identifier PACTR 202203616584913.

Indexed as

depressionhealth literacymaternal-child health servicesmental healthpostpartumprimary health carerandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID40313240
PMCPMC12043592

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.